"In response to the GOP opposition to Ambassador Susan Rice potentially being nominated to be secretary of state, liberals are doing what is by now second nature for many of them: playing the race card. Never mind that the opposition is based on the fact that Ambassador Rice misled (knowingly or not) the nation about the lethal attacks on the Benghazi consulate. Never mind that Republicans who are critical of Ambassador Rice were supporters of Condoleezza Rice when she was nominated to be secretary of state and, before her, Colin Powell. Never mind the fact that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is admired by many Republicans and most conservatives — and has been treated maliciously by the left.
Those facts don’t fit the libel, so they’re ignored.".................
That was then, this is now. Besides, the American public continues to demonstrate that we are collectively too stupid to vote ourselves out from under an Administration that is clearly bent on the destruction of the United States of America.
I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus
otisptoadwater wrote: That was then, this is now. Besides, the American public continues to demonstrate that we are collectively too stupid to vote ourselves out from under an Administration that is clearly bent on the destruction of the United States of America.
I like your post but I voted against BOTH of 'em. (Sorry if I misunderstood that you meant for us to vote for the double R's)
Raees wrote: Never mind that the article presents no evidence of anyone playing the race card....
No, couldn't be any race card being played...
[youtube:34eqh3fm][/youtube:34eqh3fm]
[youtube:34eqh3fm][/youtube:34eqh3fm]
[youtube:34eqh3fm][/youtube:34eqh3fm]
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
Raees wrote: Never mind that the article presents no evidence of anyone playing the race card....
No, couldn't be any race card being played...
]
Facts have no meaning to the left. Everything ether fits their narrative and must be defended or contradicts there narrative and must be ridiculed and attacked.
Raees wrote: Never mind that the article presents no evidence of anyone playing the race card....
No, couldn't be any race card being played...
]
Facts have no meaning to the left. Everything ether fits their narrative and must be defended or contradicts there narrative and must be ridiculed and attacked.
3-2-1_________________
I stand by my statement, there was no evidence of the race card being played in the article that complained about it. If you're going to cherry pick youtube videos, there are enough to go around from both sides.
And as for your "facts have no meaning" statement, the statement certainly fits the right as well.