I thought he was going to ask the question of why Obama was simultaneously asking for a tax increase on the evil rick folks to pay for deficit reduction to the tune of $160 Billion and also asking for another round of stimulus to the tune of $200 Billion. That, to me with the math that I learned, seems to be adding $40 Billion to the deficit rather than reducing it.
PrintSmith wrote: I thought he was going to ask the question of why Obama was simultaneously asking for a tax increase on the evil rick folks to pay for deficit reduction to the tune of $160 Billion and also asking for another round of stimulus to the tune of $200 Billion. That, to me with the math that I learned, seems to be adding $40 Billion to the deficit rather than reducing it.
Maybe he'll keep his first term promise to cut the deficit in half... ya, I'm sure he will.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
PrintSmith wrote: I thought he was going to ask the question of why Obama was simultaneously asking for a tax increase on the evil rick folks to pay for deficit reduction to the tune of $160 Billion and also asking for another round of stimulus to the tune of $200 Billion. That, to me with the math that I learned, seems to be adding $40 Billion to the deficit rather than reducing it.
Maybe he'll keep his first term promise to cut the deficit in half... ya, I'm sure he will.
No comments about how it is possible to reduce the deficit by sticking it to 2% of the population while raising spending by more than the tax increase even presuming that it would be the first time in recorded history that a tax hike actually raised the amount of revenue it was supposed to?
Riddle me this Raees, how is it possible to reduce the deficit when you are increasing spending by more than you are increasing taxes?
Raees I think that was the best and funniest post you have posted. I took it as a joke, actually someone that could make fun of their own leader and those that oppose him at the same time.
He does not follow through on some big things (like transparency in govt, job one if we let them exist) and people give him crap for stuff he cannot control as well. I think in this case, since not following though with stuff as president is way worse than being critical of a president, true or not, this is really a negative post on Obama.
But either way, Very good. Only sightly better than your current avatar.
Though I will say to your follow up comment of how people have been breaking campaign promises for some time, thus justifying it, that women have been raped for even longer and we should always be diligent in stopping both of these highly destructive practices. Broken campaign promises may even be more damaging to society.
But thanks, given my other post of how allegiant people can be to their leaders, you have impressed me more than others in your ability to be critical of your leader in this post. Thank you too for doing it the same way you are critical of others, using a poster.