Stamp messages on our nation's currency

13 Jan 2013 15:05 #1 by CinnamonGirl
Stamp messages on our nation's currency was created by CinnamonGirl
The Idea: is for tens of thousands of people across the country to stamp messages on our nation's currency in support of passing a constitutional amendment to Get Money Out of Politics.

http://stampstampede.org/

http://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0200/0202/products/NotForBribingPoliticians_SelfInking_large.jpg?532

Let me know if you buy one. Is there a law against defaming money? They think it is legal. http://stampstampede.org/stamping-tips/is-it-legal/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Jan 2013 15:13 #2 by FredHayek
I have seen "where's george been" stamps on money, you enter in the serial number and find out its travels.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Jan 2013 15:23 #3 by LadyJazzer
I like it...

You can get one for $12.00 at: http://move-to-amend.myshopify.com/prod ... oliticians

You can also get a set of three:

A Corporation Is Not a Person

Not to Be Used For Bribing Politicians

The System Isn't Broken, It's Fixed


https://salsa3.salsalabs.com/o/50137/t/ ... nt_KEY=219

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Jan 2013 15:44 #4 by LadyJazzer
Interesting that the stamping of currency is actually an offshoot of the "Move to Amend" Coalition. Which is pushing for a 28th Amendment to the Constitution. Specifically:

Move to Amend's Proposed 28th Amendment to the Constitution

Section 1 [A corporation is not a person and can be regulated]

The rights protected by the Constitution of the United States are the rights of natural persons only.

Artificial entities, such as corporations, limited liability companies, and other entities, established by the laws of any State, the United States, or any foreign state shall have no rights under this Constitution and are subject to regulation by the People, through Federal, State, or local law.

The privileges of artificial entities shall be determined by the People, through Federal, State, or local law, and shall not be construed to be inherent or inalienable.

Section 2 [Money is not speech and can be regulated]

Federal, State and local government shall regulate, limit, or prohibit contributions and expenditures, including a candidate’s own contributions and expenditures, for the purpose of influencing in any way the election of any candidate for public office or any ballot measure.

Federal, State and local government shall require that any permissible contributions and expenditures be publicly disclosed.

The judiciary shall not construe the spending of money to influence elections to be speech under the First Amendment.

Section 3

Nothing contained in this amendment shall be construed to abridge the freedom of the press.

http://movetoamend.org/

Something I can get behind....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Jan 2013 15:53 #5 by LOL
It's illegal to write on or deface currency. Lawbreakers! :lol:

If you want to be, press one. If you want not to be, press 2

Republicans are red, democrats are blue, neither of them, gives a flip about you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Jan 2013 15:57 #6 by LadyJazzer
Yeah, we'll be really worried about "enforcement".... (About as much as I'd be worried about enforcement of perpetrators of domestic violence not being allowed to own guns...)

Question 93: Is it illegal to deface money?

Answer: There is no law or statute against simply writing on a cash bill. For instance, it is not against the law to draw giant red lips on George Washington's portrait on the front of a One Dollar Bill.

However defacing currency with the intent to alter the bill to gain a benefit is illegal. If someone alters a written instrument (such as a check) without permission and with the intent to gain a benefit, then it is called forgery, which is a crime. If one tried to alter a cash bill (like changing a $5 bill to a $20 bill) for the purpose of presenting the altered bill to gain a benefit, then that could be considered a forgery. Forgery of United States Currency in this manner is called counterfeiting and carries with it very stiff penalties.

I've got sources that say unless it's for fraudulent purposes, it's not illegal... You, of course, have a source that you would like to share with us that PROVES otherwise?...I'd love to see it...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Jan 2013 16:05 #7 by Mary Scott

LadyJazzer wrote: Interesting that the stamping of currency is actually an offshoot of the "Move to Amend" Coalition. Which is pushing for a 28th Amendment to the Constitution. Specifically:

Move to Amend's Proposed 28th Amendment to the Constitution

Section 1 [A corporation is not a person and can be regulated]

The rights protected by the Constitution of the United States are the rights of natural persons only.

Artificial entities, such as corporations, limited liability companies, and other entities, established by the laws of any State, the United States, or any foreign state shall have no rights under this Constitution and are subject to regulation by the People, through Federal, State, or local law.

The privileges of artificial entities shall be determined by the People, through Federal, State, or local law, and shall not be construed to be inherent or inalienable.

Section 2 [Money is not speech and can be regulated]

Federal, State and local government shall regulate, limit, or prohibit contributions and expenditures, including a candidate’s own contributions and expenditures, for the purpose of influencing in any way the election of any candidate for public office or any ballot measure.

Federal, State and local government shall require that any permissible contributions and expenditures be publicly disclosed.

The judiciary shall not construe the spending of money to influence elections to be speech under the First Amendment.

Section 3

Nothing contained in this amendment shall be construed to abridge the freedom of the press.

http://movetoamend.org/

Something I can get behind....

As long as "other entities" include labor unions, both public and private, I will consider it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.151 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+