I agree with you both 100%. In a perfect world, the media's role would be to look out for the best interests of the people, but they are too concerned with their own best interests and ideologies.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
on that note wrote: The media is run for profit, like all other businesses.
We have met the enemy and he is us? We blame the media for slanted coverage or the glut of violent stories or celebrity stalking, but that seems to pay the bills.
After your local media with their puff pieces is replaced with a national show and then a half hour of celebrity news and then some of us go to networks which slants stories the way we want them like CNN, Fox, or MSNBC.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
And the majority of people who watch the news watch the free networks which all slant left and haven't asked the president a tough question in 4 years.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
Rick wrote: I agree with you both 100%. In a perfect world, the media's role would be to look out for the best interests of the people
, but they are too concerned with their own best interests and ideologies.
:VeryScared: WHAT! I thought they were supposed to report the truth and be sceptical of everyone. I suspect that as things stand now they believe they ARE looking out for the best interests of the people.
We have met the enemy and he is us? We blame the media for slanted coverage or the glut of violent stories or celebrity stalking, but that seems to pay the bills.
