So Bob's forum is simply an echo chamber.

We now have a local version of Fox news, as I predicted.Worthless forum IMHO.
Bob is a coward that can't handle alternative views. Simple mind, simple solution.

LadyJazzer wrote: I don't see anything disrespectful... But then, when you don't want to hear any truth, I can see where you'd have a problem.

:rofllol :rofllol :rofllol :rofllol :rofllol LJ making a comment about respect :rofllol :rofllol :rofllol :rofllol :rofllol

Oh that's rich!

drop out wrote: We now have a local version of Fox news, as I predicted.Worthless forum IMHO.
Bob is a coward that can't handle alternative views. Simple mind, simple solution.

And for some reason you have a proiblem with a forum YOU DON"T HAVE TO PARTICIPATE IN.

If Bobs forum only accomplishes one thing (keeping LJ away) then it's worth every penny. And if it wasn't for Fred feeling the need to answer every single LJ post, this place would eventually be a liberal echo chamber (or it would be a ghost town).

Rick wrote:

drop out wrote: We now have a local version of Fox news, as I predicted.Worthless forum IMHO.
Bob is a coward that can't handle alternative views. Simple mind, simple solution.

And for some reason you have a proiblem with a forum YOU DON"T HAVE TO PARTICIPATE IN.

If Bobs forum only accomplishes one thing (keeping LJ away) then it's worth every penny. And if it wasn't for Fred feeling the need to answer every single LJ post, this place would eventually be a liberal echo chamber (or it would be a ghost town).

Go for it.But why not just listen to the voices in your head and save us the trouble? I get that you don,t want to be challenged. But it hurts the site. Imho.

Poor Fred... :rofllol


[youtube:1vyggqj7][/youtube:1vyggqj7]

I get that they don't like to be "challenged" too...

Something the Dog Said wrote: Once again, pure conservative BS. It is typical that conservatives here will accept unsupported conclusions on a right wing blog by a geologist on the payroll of Koch Bros. funded Heartland Institute, particularly when those conclusions have been clearly refuted by peer reviewed climatologists.

Dog couldn't discuss any specific details about how the article was wrong. Dog just insulted conservatives with generalities and attacked the author by trying to tie him to the Koch brothers. Hell, with the principal of "six degrees of seperation" I could probably tie Dog to the Koch brothers too, not that it would mean anything. A typical attack post with no substance, details or truth. "Conservatives" were discussing the article. For one, Fred said he agreed humans have contributed to warming.

In fact, this whole thread is a great example of a typical Courthouse thread. It's pretty much just hurling insults, most coming from the left in this case. And this is how you prefer the Courthouse to be?

If you don't like Bob's forum, you don't have to read it. But it seems everyone is...

No... Everyone isn't.

LadyJazzer wrote: No... Everyone isn't.

I assumed you visit, otherwise this would appear to of been a totally uninformed comment.

LadyJazzer wrote: Like I said... A little "echo chamber"...."Where never is heard a discouraging word...(And the skies are not cloudy all daaaaaay.....)"

Well, it gives them a place to run and hide and not have to do anything but agree with each other...

And you might try reading the climate change topic there which this thread is about. People are making comments from both sides and last I checked there are no personal attacks. There are "discouraging word"s of disagreement. Imagine that!

But if you'd rather just use your imagination for your comments about that forum, there is no need to read anything there if you don't want to. Stick to Daily Kos if you wish... lol

huff post

I don't need your permission on what to read; where to read; when to read; what to post...

But thanks...