I think the Christian Science Monitor is one of the most objective sources in the field, today.
They're fair, compassionate, and thorough.
I also read the Economist a lot (they're removed from the frenzy of US Politics)
I know a lot of people poo-poo the NYT --- but they do employ a few token conservatives.
Frankly - when it comes to literature and technology, it's hard to find a peer.
bailey bud wrote: I think the Christian Science Monitor is one of the most objective sources in the field, today.
They're fair, compassionate, and thorough.
I also read the Economist a lot (they're removed from the frenzy of US Politics)
I know a lot of people poo-poo the NYT --- but they do employ a few token conservatives.
Frankly - when it comes to literature and technology, it's hard to find a peer.
I also read Stratfor --- with some hesitation.
In agreement with CSM...... I forgot about them......Since Stratfor was "hacked" and the ensuing fubar afterwards,I was dismayed
and disappointed in their lax security.......they should have been on top of that issue. NOTHING IS SECURE.......
