LadyJazzer wrote: You never heard the term "typo"? It'll take me about 10 seconds to find 3 pages full for the Righties... Oh heavens!! Alert the spelling-police!
(Of course there is also a WWWF "World Wrestling Federation"), but yep... That typo from "WWF" to "WWE" must have been a deliberate alteration on my part...
Actually, the deliberate alteration was to the title of a quoted article in huffingtonpost as if that was the title. When I see something in quotes I expect the original to look the same. Just sayin'.
There is a character limit on the length that titles can be... If one want to make the title have some semblance of readability, then occasionally some editing is required to make it fit... The original article title would not fit.
LadyJazzer wrote: You never heard the term "typo"? It'll take me about 10 seconds to find 3 pages full for the Righties... Oh heavens!! Alert the spelling-police!
(Of course there is also a WWWF "World Wrestling Federation"), but yep... That typo from "WWF" to "WWE" must have been a deliberate alteration on my part...
Actually, the deliberate alteration was to the title of a quoted article in huffingtonpost as if that was the title. When I see something in quotes I expect the original to look the same. Just sayin'.
There is a character limit on the length that titles can be... If one want to make the title have some semblance of readability, then occasionally some editing is required to make it fit... The original article title would not fit.
LadyJazzer wrote: There is a character limit on the length that titles can be... If one want to make the title have some semblance of readability, then occasionally some editing is required to make it fit... The original article title would not fit.
But you knew that...
Another outrage-of-the-day deflected....
Sorry, that does not justify, or explain, why you changed the title of the original article.
LadyJazzer wrote: There is a character limit on the length that titles can be... If one want to make the title have some semblance of readability, then occasionally some editing is required to make it fit... The original article title would not fit.
But you knew that...
Another outrage-of-the-day deflected....
Sorry, that does not justify, or explain, why you changed the title of the original article.
Who cares, it will always lie & decive once a loon (amost) always a loon......... some as myself have growth-up , and seen the Right!
:rofllol 
