- Posts: 14880
- Thank you received: 27
Topic Author
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/0 ... r=PoliticsConservative Media Struggles For Credibility, Amid Coverage Of Hookers, Hamas And Hagel
Conservative media made noise during the 2012 election but had little impact on the news cycle. Both The Daily Caller and Breitbart News hyped 14-yr-old videos of Obama, which despite being amplified on The Drudge Report and Fox News, received more mockery from the national press than follow-up. In response to Romney’s infamous "47 percent video" –- a clearly newsworthy recording –- Fox News attempted to equate his remarks with a 14-year-old Obama quote about wealth "redistribution." The out-of-context clip had little resonance beyond those cable viewers still convinced that Obama is a socialist.
Perhaps the most defining feature of the conservative media's election coverage, however, was just how wildly off base it was in predicting the outcome. Paid for their political analysis, several prominent conservative pundits predicted a landslide Romney victory. On election night, Karl Rove, speaking as an analyst for Fox News, practically begged the network to hold off on calling Ohio, and therefore the election, for Obama.
The anti-Hagel pile-on also produced notable missteps, such as when Breitbart’s Ben Shapiro relayed word from an anonymous Senate aide that Hagel may have once been paid to speak before the [non-existent] group "Friends of Hamas." While all news outlets make mistakes, what stood out was Shapiro's unwillingness to admit that he pushed a bogus rumor.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Topic Author
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/0 ... 11994.htmlFox News Apologizes For Big Error
Fox News deleted a story on Tuesday morning after it was found to have lifted substantial portions of material from Politico.
After Romenesko raised the issue, Fox News yanked the story and put an editor's note in its place:
"Due to a reporting error, a March 1 FoxNews.com story on the timing and impact of the sequestration cuts used information from an internal research document that contained material previously published by other news organizations. The story did not properly credit the sources of that material, and has subsequently been removed from FoxNews.com.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
They apologized for not crediting the source of the information, not for the accuracy of the information.Rick wrote: Ya, MSNBC never lies, f***s up, or creatively edits to make a liberal point.... oh wait.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Topic Author
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.