Perhaps you should read the second article which comments on the only study that examines the early forecasts and finds them accurate. Or are one of those individuals who only reads those points that support your allegations and ignores everything else?
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
FredHayek wrote: I loved when rockdoc weighed in on these threads awhile ago. A man who looks at the world in eons of times as opposed to these chicken littles who base everything on 200 years of unreliable info.
Yep, nothing like a petroleum geologist employed by the carbon industry to override the scientific studies on climate research supported by 97% of the world's climate scientists.
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
Like climate scientists who would profit from pushing the alarm button and get more funding for the study of "climate change"? They have no reason at all to lie to Al Gore and predict a hockey stick that never happened.
Next admit it isn't happening as quickly as predicted despite the developing world buliding nasty new coal fired power plants every day.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
FredHayek wrote: Like climate scientists who would profit from pushing the alarm button and get more funding for the study of "climate change"? They have no reason at all to lie to Al Gore and predict a hockey stick that never happened.
Next admit it isn't happening as quickly as predicted despite the developing world buliding nasty new coal fired power plants every day.
There is no support for your smear against these hard working scientists. But of course you prefer petroleum geologists employed by the oil companies for your "unbiased" "facts".
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
I'm a trained geologist who has seen strong physical evidence of significant, repeated climate and sea level change during periods of time well before modern man and the industrial age (the Quaternary Period) . The climate and sea level have changed several times before and they will again. I'm not currently employed by the oil industry nor do I receive money from the global warming crowd. I just know what I have seen with my own eyes.
Neverthless, I would appreciate it if the Chicken Littles of the world would just let me know when this climate catastrophe will occur so I can drink some good whiskey and slit my wrists before the world ends.
lionshead2010 wrote: I'm a trained geologist who has seen strong physical evidence of significant, repeated climate and sea level change during periods of time well before modern man and the industrial age (the Quaternary Period) . The climate and sea level have changed several times before and they will again. I'm not currently employed by the oil industry nor do I receive money from the global warming crowd. I just know what I have seen with my own eyes.
Neverthless, I would appreciate it if the Chicken Littles of the world would just let me know when this climate catastrophe will occur so I can drink some good whiskey and slit my wrists before the world ends.
"Slit my wrists"... hell... I want a front row seat. :woo hoo:
Something the Dog Said wrote: There is no support for your smear against these hard working scientists. But of course you prefer petroleum geologists employed by the oil companies for your "unbiased" "facts".
If you think all of these "hard working scientists" are not driven by personal agendas and have some sort of untouchable level of altruism to them, you are badly mistaken. Climate change research funding is BIG money, in the billions and growing. That's why anyone who questions their failed models and inaccurate predictions is demonized and attacked, and in some cases fired.