South Carolina-Special Election

08 May 2013 18:32 #31 by FredHayek
LJ reminds me of the Fonz: Just can't say she was wro...wro...wro...ong.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 May 2013 18:54 #32 by LadyJazzer
Wrong about what?... Did I say she would win?... Sorry, I read back through the thread and I can't find that... Perhaps you can show me where I did?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 May 2013 19:20 #33 by pineinthegrass

LadyJazzer wrote: We knew he had the "Bubba"-vote going in...

And it wasn't me that was paying any attention to Rasmussen... It was you guys... (And we KNOW how accurate they were in the last presidential election!)

:rofllol :lol:


You guys??? Who are you lumping together now? So far as I know, I've only mentioned a Rasmussen poll once (from 2007) and it wasn't about an election.

For your diversion..... BUMP! lol

Rick wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote:

FredHayek wrote: Guess LJ shouldn't have trusted that Rasmussen poll that showed Colbert so far ahead. Weiner/Sanford 2016!!!!


I didn't trust any of the polls, and I would have been astounded if Colbert-Busch had won...

It says more about the low-intelligence voters of S.C. than anything. Not unexpected...

LadyJazzer wrote: And then we have the REAL "winners" in seats that should have been slam-dunks for the GOTP:
Colbert-Bush has 9-10 point lead over Sanford for the congressional district.
Bachmann may be under indictment by election time for federal campaign violations, but is already behind in the polls...

...and the list continues...

And I hope they keep consulting the polls by Rasmussen, FauxNews, Karl Rove, Dick Morris, Rush Limbaugh, Matt Drudge, and George Will, etc..... The polls will tell them exactly what they want to hear--all the way up to the point where the races are called for the actual winners.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 May 2013 19:24 #34 by LadyJazzer
At the time I said that Colbert-Busch had a 9-10 point lead over Sanford, she did...

Colbert Busch leads Sanford in South Carolina congressional race: poll
Reuters - By Harriet McLeod | Reuters – Tue, Apr 23, 2013

CHARLESTON, South Carolina (Reuters) - Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch has a nine-point lead over former South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford, her Republican opponent in the race for the state's open congressional seat, according to a poll released on Monday.

In the first independent poll taken since the primary election, Colbert Busch was favored by likely voters 50 percent to Sanford's 41 percent, Public Policy Polling said.



Y'know, I still can't find where I said she'd WIN... Can you point that out to me?

I DO remember saying:

LadyJazzer wrote: I didn't trust any of the polls, and I would have been astounded if Colbert-Busch had won...


Hmmmm... Doesn't sound like I said she'd win there... Maybe it's hiding in the same place as W's "WMD's"?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 May 2013 20:02 #35 by Rick

LadyJazzer wrote: At the time I said that Colbert-Busch had a 9-10 point lead over Sanford, she did...

Colbert Busch leads Sanford in South Carolina congressional race: poll
Reuters - By Harriet McLeod | Reuters – Tue, Apr 23, 2013

CHARLESTON, South Carolina (Reuters) - Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch has a nine-point lead over former South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford, her Republican opponent in the race for the state's open congressional seat, according to a poll released on Monday.

In the first independent poll taken since the primary election, Colbert Busch was favored by likely voters 50 percent to Sanford's 41 percent, Public Policy Polling said.



Y'know, I still can't find where I said she'd WIN... Can you point that out to me?

I DO remember saying:

LadyJazzer wrote: I didn't trust any of the polls, and I would have been astounded if Colbert-Busch had won...


Hmmmm... Doesn't sound like I said she'd win there... Maybe it's hiding in the same place as W's "WMD's"?

What was the point in mentioning the polling if you were not suggesting she was going to win? I suppose if the polls had Sanford ahead, you would still post the poll? No fucking way you would.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.143 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+