- Posts: 14880
- Thank you received: 27
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/0 ... _ref=mediaRush Limbaugh Toxic To Major Advertisers, Radio Company Says
Cumulus: Nearly All Top Advertisers Have 'Exclude Rush Limbaugh' Orders
The battle between Rush Limbaugh and the Cumulus radio network continued on Wednesday.
The two camps have been trading accusations for days, ever since anonymous Limbaugh backers told the New York Daily News that the host was thinking of abandoning the network due to CEO Lew Dickey's repeated assertions that his controversial comments were hurting ad sales.
On Tuesday, Dickey continued the pattern. Asked about Limbaugh during an earnings call, he said, "The facts are indisputable regarding the impact certain things have had on ad dollars."
Then, trade site Radio Ink quoted a "very high ranking Cumulus official," who said, "Forty-eight of the top 50 network advertisers have 'exclude Rush and Hannity' orders. Every major national ad agency has the same dictate." This statement was in line with other reports about the ad market's hostility towards Limbaugh.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Just as racist as white pepper vs black pepper!The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: I don't... unless I'm in the car going somewhere in the afternoon... more like "white" noise (is that racist?)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote: The number that is important is NOT "number of listeners", or "ratings"....It's ADVERTISER REVENUE....And it's dropping...a lot...And the network is saying so...LOUDLY.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Blazer Bob wrote:
LadyJazzer wrote: The number that is important is NOT "number of listeners", or "ratings"....It's ADVERTISER REVENUE....And it's dropping...a lot...And the network is saying so...LOUDLY.
Some days it just does not pay to get out of bed.
................"The boycott, organized mostly by the left-wing Media Matters, can now officially be called a failure with the news that advertisers have not only returned, but that the show is pacing ahead of last year:".............
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism ... cott-Fails
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Nobody that matters wrote:
Blazer Bob wrote:
LadyJazzer wrote: The number that is important is NOT "number of listeners", or "ratings"....It's ADVERTISER REVENUE....And it's dropping...a lot...And the network is saying so...LOUDLY.
Some days it just does not pay to get out of bed.
................"The boycott, organized mostly by the left-wing Media Matters, can now officially be called a failure with the news that advertisers have not only returned, but that the show is pacing ahead of last year:".............
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism ... cott-Fails
FACTS are a b*tch, aren't they?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote:
Since Breitbart and/or Drudge and "FACTS" do not belong in the same sentence, yes FACTS are a b*tch... Let me know when you have some.
I read that the network is still losing money on Limbaugh, and they are not happy... I just want him to keep doin' what he's doing....and join the GOTP Death March...
NEW YORK - Rush Limbaugh’s distributor on Thursday said there is no denying the conservative radio host’s controversial comments about Sandra Fluke hurt advertising last year — but 2013 is apparently a whole different ballgame.
This year, Limbaugh is drawing new advertisers and recovering well after the major boycott he faced in response to his broadcasts on Fluke, Premiere Radio senior vice president and director of talk radio sales Dan Metter told the Talkers New York 2013 conference.
“Many of these companies, especially in this economy, need talk radio,” he said. “The endorsement of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Randi Rhodes and George Noory is gold to these guys. That builds their brands, makes their business. So where the challenge has been with regard to the controversy is we did have a little bit of a dip — a great deal of a dip in the second quarter last year after it happened — we’ve refocused and gone out after those entrepreneur based companies. And now, a year later, we’re doing very well.”
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/d ... 92355.html
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.