RT Benghazi on C-Span3

And none so blind as those who only see what they want to see. If you want there to be some sort of cover up for Bengazi, because that is what would place both Obama and Hillary in a politically bad situation, then for sure that is what you will see.

homeagain wrote: I can't get C-Span3 (1 and 2 is all I get).......Have they spoke to the "Botched CIA and State Dept agreement for security...you know
the fact that WSJ reported on in Nov.2012?......I have yet to hear THAT piece of information.... :faint:

There IS a problem and the problem has NOT been addressed in a transparent way........IF I have missed the part where they have
addressed the fubar (CIA and State Dept. lack of communication/understanding of security) then I will apologize. THERE IS A PROBLEM

Plus trying to cover up that this was an Al Quaida operation. The US Libyan diplomats told Hilary that but she preferred lying to the American public.

We are just seeing that big broad brush making strokes again.
It requires especially shallow thought as to believe that those who question the actions and behavior of this administration in regards to Benghazi are merely on a witch hunt and only care about the political embarrassment of this administration.
I have a son serving this country. I would want to know the truth about how he died if that unfortunate situation should occur.
We all want to trust what our government tells us but unfortunately, this administration has made that blatantly impossible.
If there is no cover up. If they did everything they could......put that on the table and let us all move on to the other business of this country.
Once you lie once, everything else is questioned. That is just human nature.
This administration knew this was a terrorist attack from the very beginning yet they chose to fabricate an odd unbelievable story and in true liberal fashion, believed that if they said it enough, we would all believe it. Unfortunately for many in this country, that is all they need to believe something.
Even many prominent democrats are jumping off this ship yet the faithful here just keep parroting the Carney talking points.
People have been threatened, demoted and their careers have been decimated if they dared to speak up. It would seem to me that most decent people would find that behavior distasteful.

Congressional Democrats on Sunday distanced themselves from the Obama administration’s explanation of the Benghazi, Libya, attacks in the immediate aftermath of the fatal strikes, amid mounting evidence that suggests the information was revised to intentionally mislead Americans.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05 ... -evidence/

Here is the first part of the hearing for those who missed it. If your truly interested in the truth......watch it.

[youtube:1uxvwvtk][/youtube:1uxvwvtk]

Here are some highlights from the hearing.

[youtube:1uxvwvtk][/youtube:1uxvwvtk]

[youtube:1uxvwvtk][/youtube:1uxvwvtk]

[youtube:1uxvwvtk][/youtube:1uxvwvtk]

[youtube:1uxvwvtk][/youtube:1uxvwvtk]

How anyone could not find the actions of this administration in regards to this entire incident deplorable is beyond my comprehension.
If it had been Bush, I would feel the exact same way.

Both congressional parties agree that there is a need for additional hearings on this issue.

archer wrote: And none so blind as those who only see what they want to see. If you want there to be some sort of cover up for Bengazi, because that is what would place both Obama and Hillary in a politically bad situation, then for sure that is what you will see.

Congress has to do it since the lapdog press won't. They want to be part of the cool crowd so they accept whatever the administration tells them.

archer wrote: And none so blind as those who only see what they want to see. If you want there to be some sort of cover up for Bengazi, because that is what would place both Obama and Hillary in a politically bad situation, then for sure that is what you will see.

And if you are Clinton or Obama supporter, you will be blind to ANYTHING these people do that is dishonest. You see them as these great leaders who couldn't possibly cover up a series of bad decisions.

Blazer Bob wrote:

FredHayek wrote: Fox & CNN are covering it too. MSNBC?

Rhetorical question, right?

Someone should start a poll.

1. It is Bush's fault.

2. Bush did it too.

3. It was so long ago, what does it matter?

4 It is just a partisan witch hunt.

5. It was all Obama's fault and he cannot run again so shut up.

6.___________?

#5 is coming on strong. Koan is a liberal legend at another site.

From: koan

of 223920







We need to reconstitute a strong Democratic party and quit looking to Obama for all the answers.

The house is gone. We will probably lose the senate in 2014 and get it back in 2016. The presidency is ours forever if we don't screw up, and so we will also have the supreme court.

I think part of our problem was we were looking at the shiny object (Obama) and forgot abut the democratic party; and the Democratic party deferred to Obama too much and did not demand of him what we really wanted. It was forbidden to challenge his ideas for a long time.

He, Gibbs and Rahm should never have told the liberals to quit whining. They have always been the brains of he Democratic party. They pushed them out he door for 2010 and so who was there to work out a 2010 strategy?


http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsgs ... htype=Next

Blazer Bob wrote:

FredHayek wrote: Fox & CNN are covering it too. MSNBC?

Rhetorical question, right?

Someone should start a poll.

1. It is Bush's fault.

2. Bush did it too.

3. It was so long ago, what does it matter?

4 It is just a partisan witch hunt.

5. It was all Obama's fault and he cannot run again so shut up.

6.___________?

"From: John Vosilla

of 133871


I'd like an investigation into the 10+ trillion spent on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the lives ruined over our false occupation, bad intelligence and an administration hell bent on conflict in the middle east looking for that smoking gun as an excuse.. Are we really safer from this decade long exercise in futility? Fcuk Benghazi..."

http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsgs ... htype=Next