RT Benghazi on C-Span3

I don't think for one minute the GOP is doing this to find out what happened, this is simply an attempt to discredit Obama and Hillary (most especially) for something that has happened on the watch of many Presidents and Secretaries of State.....mistakes are made, intelligence misread or not responded to quickly enough, conflicting stories put out before all the facts are in.....and it will happen again and again, but apparently if it happens on the Republicans watch, as it has in the past......the Republicans in Congress let it pass.......I will be interested to see how the GOP keeps this alive for 3+ years. Unless, of course, Hillary decides not to run for President.....then they will let it go.

Last two US ambassadors killed? Under Carter and under Obama. Good job President Clinton, you didn't lose any ambassadors to enemy action!

FredHayek wrote: Last two US ambassadors killed? Under Carter and under Obama. Good job President Clinton, you didn't lose any ambassadors to enemy action!

Oh, now I get it......as long as the Ambassador isn't killed there is no outrage, you will let it pass if only embassy employees are killed in a terrorist attack

2002: U.S. Consulate In Karachi, Pakistan, Attacked; 10 Killed, 51 Injured. From a June 15, 2002, Chicago Tribune article:

I can't get C-Span3 (1 and 2 is all I get).......Have they spoke to the "Botched CIA and State Dept agreement for security...you know
the fact that WSJ reported on in Nov.2012?......I have yet to hear THAT piece of information.... :faint:

archer wrote:

FredHayek wrote: Last two US ambassadors killed? Under Carter and under Obama. Good job President Clinton, you didn't lose any ambassadors to enemy action!

Oh, now I get it......as long as the Ambassador isn't killed there is no outrage, you will let it pass if only embassy employees are killed in a terrorist attack

2002: U.S. Consulate In Karachi, Pakistan, Attacked; 10 Killed, 51 Injured. From a June 15, 2002, Chicago Tribune article:

Or maybe it is because in Karachi we did the best we could in the situation, like the Iranian Embassy and the hostages, unlike Benghazi where we stood down rather than helped? And afterwards, let the Libyan goverment stall the investigation into the deaths.

archer wrote: 6. Anything the Republicans can do to avoid doing the real work of this nation.

7. Anything the Republicans can do to hold this administration to it's promise of being the most transparent administration ever.

These people WORK FOR US, not the other way around. Just like Watergate, we should not stand for being lied to by our employees and if it takes these kind of hearings, so be it. If you can't see attempts to decieve, your partisanship has blinded you.

I haven't seen a whole lot of these people working for us.... But believe what you want if it makes you feel better.

It's pretty disgusting that the conservatives are making the deaths of 4 Americans serving their country more important than the other Americans who served their country and died just because these four can be exploited for political gain.

archer wrote: It's pretty disgusting that the conservatives are making the deaths of 4 Americans serving their country more important than the other Americans who served their country and died just because these four can be exploited for political gain.

I find your myopia to be pretty amazing. Is there nothing you will not turn a blind eye towards?

There are none so blind as those who will not see.