Union Support Waning for the Affordable Care Act

18 Jul 2013 08:29 #11 by Rick

FredHayek wrote: Crickets chirping? Any liberals want to offer evidence that union members do like ACA?

That's because there is no possible counter-argument to this FUBAR.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Jul 2013 08:47 #12 by Blazer Bob

Rick wrote:

FredHayek wrote: Crickets chirping? Any liberals want to offer evidence that union members do like ACA?

That's because there is no possible counter-argument to this FUBAR.



:rofllol :rofllol When has that ever mattered?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Jul 2013 15:32 #13 by Mtn Gramma

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Jul 2013 20:17 #14 by Blazer Bob

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Jul 2013 08:58 #15 by Rick

Blazer Bob wrote:

Sooooo true but soooo not mentioned in 90% of the media. This should be a big story, but for some strange reason....

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Jul 2013 14:18 #16 by Blazer Bob

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Jul 2013 18:17 #17 by Reverend Revelant
And let's not leave out the Laborers Union...

In a letter sent to President Barack Obama on Thursday, Laborers International Union of North America President Terry O’Sullivan wrote that the law has “destructive consequences” for the types of health plans that cover millions of unionized construction workers and their family members.

Mr. O’Sullivan zeroed in on some factors that could directly impact unionized construction workers who are typically covered by multiemployer plans. He noted that costs are rising for such plans because of the law’s benefit mandates. Moreover, a tax under the law would cost such health plans $63 per covered individual, or $630,000 for a plan covering 10,000 people, he wrote. The proceeds of the tax will be used to subsidize insurance companies offering health plans in the Health Exchanges.

“In effect, ACA takes money from the pockets of each laborer covered by a health and welfare fund and gives it to for-profit insurance companies,” Mr. O’Sullivan wrote. Those added costs will eventually impact collective bargaining agreements, he said, making union construction companies less competitive than nonunion ones and resulting in less work for union laborers.

Mr. O’Sullivan concluded: “Approximately 3 million laborers, retirees, and their families now face the very real prospect of losing their health benefits. This, I must remind you, was something that you promised would not happen.”

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/07/1 ... od=WSJBlog


Well... what did the union expect? Remember what Nancy Pelosi said...“We have to pass the [health care] bill so that you can find out what's in it." It's all becoming much more clear now.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.141 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+