Think it is disgraceful for Wenner's music magazine to make a terrorist into a dreamy rock star? I think they are only doing it to get attention. Think it is a good idea for chain stores to refuse to stock the magazine? Personally I think the stores should still offer RS for sale. Free speech right? But no one says people have to buy it.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
FredHayek wrote: Think it is disgraceful for Wenner's music magazine to make a terrorist into a dreamy rock star?
Reactionaries will. RS did not ask for him to pose for the cover. This same picture appeared in many magazines and news shows. RS has a glossy cover, does that make it more offensive? You can't judge a book (or in this case a magazine) by it's cover can you? Read the article and decide for yourself. Covers are supposedto draw your attention. Obviously store owner can display this issue (or not) in any way they choose.
If you ask me, this self photograh makes him look like your average slacker teenager in Anytown USA. And that should really make you think.
[marquee:2vqhharm]* * OFF TOPIC * *[/marquee:2vqhharm]
Did you hear what Jeffrey Dahmer said to Pee Wee Herman (Paul Rubens)? Jeffrey told him that he shouldn't play with his food.
* * We now return you to your regularly scheduled program * *
I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus
