Justice for Trayvon?

The complainers continue to demand Justice for Trayvon.

I have not seen a definition of what that is supposed to mean.

Zimmerman was found not guilty of everything the prosecution threw at him. He has spent time in jail, much $$, undergone much psychological stress, and that is not over yet. Is he somehow supposed to pay even more for what he has been judged not guilty of?

Or is the entire State of Florida somehow guilty of something, and therefore should pay, i.e., the proposed boycotts of the State?

What do the complainers really want?

It's the entitlement mindset of our liberal population; give us what we want or we'll throw a tantrum, damn the long established laws of the land. Spare the rod and spoil the child.

Well shucks....I think they learned that from the conservatives. Only difference? Liberals throw their tantrums in the towns, and cities....in the streets of America. Conservatives throw theirs in Congress.

Got a problem with the established laws? Contact your elected representatives and appeal to them to make changes. Hold peaceable assemblies and let your fellow countrymen know what you want; Occupy got half of that right. They held demonstrations but didn't/don't have a focused opinion on what should change. As for the justice for Trayvon movement, nothing they do will bring that unfortunate young man back to life. The trial has been conducted, Zimmerman found not guilty, move on it's over.

Well shucks....I think they learned that from the conservatives. Only difference? Liberals throw their tantrums in the towns, and cities....in the streets of America. Conservatives throw theirs in Congress.

For the sake of debate let's say I agree with that.

The question remains, what do the complainers want? What do they expect Zimmerman, the State of Florida, the United States, to do?

Or, do they not have a clue either, and are just complaining for the sake of complaining - getting attention, and helping to keep our country divided?

Maybe I have not been plain about my question.

What do they want?

What do the complainers want? Zimmerman on the end of a rope, hung from the nearest tree.

Isn't it ironic that the Democratic party and the leftest that support them would come full circle to their origin; lynching people even if due process found a defendant not guilty.

What do they want? They want to bring attention to the fact that our justice system treats the poor and minorities different than wealthy and white That it is helpful if you shoot someone and claim self defense, to be white. That self defense worked for Zimmerman but not for Trayvon. Zimmerman cannot be tried again, they know that, but they have the right in this country to make their opinion known on this subject...... They also have the right to work to change the laws and to make the American public aware of the reality of life for black teenagers in America. They are considered guilty until proven innocent.

Oh, and otis... Your post is one of the most offensive I have read in a long time. Not that you care.

archer, I hope you enjoy being offended by me, frankly I'm glad you find my opinion offensive, maybe after some introspection you'll realize how wrong you are. Just to inject a fact, Zimmerman isn't white, not that is going to register with you. The truth is a real MF in this case for you and it's too bad you can't accept it. If you have a beef with the laws of the land then you might consider contacting the officials you and those like you elected. Otherwise let's break out the shotguns and pitchforks and lynch Zimmerman and anyone else who has a problem with the outcome of this case, the law no longer applies.

Silly me.... Of course a right wing nut would know more about what the protestors would want than a liberal. This wasn't about what I believe, or think about the trial, or plan to do, my post was in respone to the question what do the protestors want. If you want to take that as an opportunity to attack me, fine. Once again you prove how little conservatives listen to anything but the hateful little voices in their own heads.

Have a night otisptoadwater.

And your point was what? Deflection and more of the same. Reply with a retort or don't reply at all. It's obvious that you have no facts to refute my posts.