Dem Chair: But We've Waited So Long for a Progressive Agenda

Francine Busby, Chair of that San Diego Democrat Party, told the New York Times that the party was giving Mayor Filner the "benefit of doubt" because they were so excited to have someone in office pushing a progressive agenda.

"Democrats aren’t going to give him a pass, but may be willing to give him the benefit of the doubt because we’ve waited so long, nearly 20 years, for a mayor who could put forward a progressive agenda," she said.

"But this doesn’t erase what he’s done," she said. "I don’t know if it’s enough at this point."

(Translation: Close your eyes and think of San Diego)

Let's recap. What did the San Diego Democrat Party know before the women started revealing themselves?

Read more: http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013/07/28/San-Diego-Dem-Chair-But-We-ve-Waited-So-Long-for-a-Progressive-Agenda?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Everything is cool, he is a dem. It depend on what the meaning of is is.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/sep ... i-goldberg

"Polanski was not guilty of 'rape-rape', says Whoopi Goldberg"

Yep, what he did/does isn't as important as his agenda. The ends justify the means.

otisptoadwater wrote: Yep, what he did/does isn't as important as his agenda. The ends justify the means.

I had no idea he was a Republican.....Isn't that the conservative mantra?

archer wrote:

otisptoadwater wrote: Yep, what he did/does isn't as important as his agenda. The ends justify the means.

I had no idea he was a Republican.....Isn't that the conservative mantra?

no

archer wrote: I had no idea he was a Republican.....Isn't that the conservative mantra?

Robert Earl "Bob" Filner (born September 4, 1942) is an American politician from San Diego, California. He is the 35th and current Mayor of San Diego. Filner was previously the U.S. Representative for California's 51st congressional district, and previously the 50th, serving from 1993 to 2012, and was chairman of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs 2007-2011. He is a member of the Democratic Party.

Read more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Filner

Maybe do some research next time?

I don't need to do research.....Otis labeled him a Republican with this

otisptoadwater wrote: Yep, what he did/does isn't as important as his agenda. The ends justify the means.

Who knew Otis would lie.


Seriously, the man needs to go.....along with Weiner, and Sandford (oops, he has already been elected by the Republicans)

'Splain to me how I lied. You're the one saying he's a Republican.

otisptoadwater wrote: 'Splain to me how I lied. You're the one saying he's a Republican.

But, But Otis, you perfectly described how Republicans view scandal.....so silly me, I assumed you were describing a Republican. My bad.

archer wrote:

otisptoadwater wrote: 'Splain to me how I lied. You're the one saying he's a Republican.

But, But Otis, you perfectly described how Republicans view scandal.....so silly me, I assumed you were describing a Republican. My bad.

So the only way out of getting nailed down on a real issue is to deflect and claim it's the Republican's fault? I take it you're ok with a Mayor who is grabbing women's asses and committing sexual harassment against the women who helped to elect him and are willing to give him a pass because he has a progressive agenda?