Court Rules Obama WH Doesn't Have To Reveal Visitor Log

30 Aug 2013 14:14 #1 by FredHayek
#mosttransparentadministrationever

And President Barack, who are you trying to hide?

Goes along with his bureaucrats who persist in using fake e-mail accounts to hide who they are talking to and what they are saying.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Aug 2013 14:19 #2 by LadyJazzer
Imagine my surprise... The court ruled the same thing when the Dems wanted to see the logs of the secret meetings that were held with Cheney, Bush and all of the energy-company/fossil-fuel execs...

I'm SHOCKED, I tell you, SHOCKED!

Court halts release of Cheney visitor logs
Nov 3, 2006

Three appeals judges agree to suspend a ruling that ordered the release of information about the vice president's visitors until after the midterm election.

Nov. 3, 2006 · A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., has suspended a ruling that ordered the Secret Service to release or offer justification for withholding information about two years of visitors to Vice President Dick Cheney.

The decision comes two weeks after U.S. District Judge Ricardo M. Urbina ordered prompt disclosure of the logs of visitors to Cheney's office and home, which The Washington Post requested through the Freedom of Information Act in June. Urbina also ordered the release of visitor logs for 12 of Cheney's senior staff members.


I guess it's kind of like rich-guys donating to 527's... When the teabaggers do it, it's okay... When the Dems do it--not so much.

#asTransparentAsBushCheney... Not so much


Next outrage-of-the-day: ___________________________

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Aug 2013 14:25 #3 by FredHayek
But Cheney didn't say this would be the most transparent administration ever.

Easy to promise when you are a candidate, right Barack?

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Aug 2013 14:26 #4 by ScienceChic
I am against both court rulings. If they can't make available visitors logs, it's plain wrong for the People. Doesn't matter what side you're on.

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Aug 2013 14:32 #5 by Photo-fish
I never use my real name on vistor logs.

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Aug 2013 14:35 #6 by Blazer Bob

Photo-fish wrote: I never use my real name on vistor logs.


yea, I hear that all you need to visit the white house is a utility bill or a provisional ID.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Aug 2013 14:39 #7 by FredHayek
Jay Carney: We won't tell you who is visiting the White House, but if you want to tour the White House, you aren't allowed.

Money to blow up Syrians but not to let Americans visit.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.137 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+