Faltering Federal Investment In Science Threatetens Research

02 Sep 2013 10:12 #1 by ScienceChic
This is an ominous foreboding for the future of science and our economy if this trend is allowed to continue. I understand that our economy is hurting and cuts must be made, but when you start cutting that which creates GDP in terms of innovation, inventions, patents, etc, then you are cutting off your nose to spite your face and it will have lasting, long-term consequences. That innovation will move to other countries and they will benefit and we will lose.

Press release:
Survey Shows Faltering Federal Investment In Science Threatens American Research

ROCKVILLE, MD. - Today, the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology released its 2013 report on government-funded scientific research titled “Unlimited Potential, Vanishing Opportunity.”

The report, detailing the findings of a survey of more than 3,700 frontline scientists from all fifty states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia, depicts clearly the broad impact of cuts to federal investments in science funding. The survey, conducted in June and July 2013 by sixteen scientific societies representing a variety of scientific disciplines, asked questions regarding cuts to nondefense discretionary spending by Congress since 2010. These cuts reached a historic low in March with sequestration.

“For the first time, we are able to definitively tell the story of the federally funded scientist,” said Benjamin Corb, public affairs directorfor ASBMB. “The data shows that deep cuts to federal investments in research are tearing at the fabric of the nation’s scientific enterprise and have a minimal impact on overcoming our national debt and deficit problems. I hope leaders from both parties in Washington review these findings and join with scientists to say ‘enough is enough.’”

Some critical statistics from the report include:
• Private investment in academic research has been feeble. Only 2 percent of survey respondents have been able to find private funds to make up for those lost from federal grants.

• More than two thirds of survey respondents do not have the funds to expand their research operations, postponing important scientific advances in all fields.

• Research jobs have been lost. Nearly half of survey respondents have laid off researchers and 55 percent have a colleague who has lost his/her job.

• An overwhelming majority of scientists in all fields believes the U.S. has lost its position as the global leader in scientific research.

However, in the face of such adversity, nearly 95 percent of respondents indicated they want to
continue their careers as scientists so they can attempt to make the breakthroughs and discoveries that will shape our society for decades to come. “The men and women in laboratories across the country live with the specter of budget uncertainty daily and yet continue to exemplify the passion and curiosity that has characterized American science for the past 70 years,” Corb concluded. “Congress must act before the damage caused by sequestration is irreversible. This damage won’t be measured just in the number of scientists laid off from labs today, but in the wait for breakthroughs in alternative energy, technology development and cures for disease. Our report paints a clear picture of the importance of scientific research to American society, and why Congress should act now to overturn sequestration and return to a policy of a strong, sustained investment in science.”

Copies of the report are available electronically on ASBMB’s website or can be provided by contacting Benjamin Corb via email at . or via telephone at 240.283.6625.

Survey Data


NIH - GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS – THE IMPORTANCE OF U.S. LEADERSHIP IN SCIENCE AND INNOVATION FOR THE FUTURE OF OUR ECONOMY AND OUR HEALTH

Global Research Investment
• The U.S. life sciences industry supports more than 7 million jobs and contributes $69 billion annually to U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), but trails the developed world in government investment in medical science R&D as a share of GDP. In 2011, a $1 billion public investment in medical R&D would increase GDP by 0.048 percent annually, or roughly $6 billion.

• Between 1999 and 2009, the Asian region’s share of worldwide R&D expenditures grew from 24 percent to 32 percent while the U.S. R&D expenditures declined from 38 percent to 31 percent.


Declining NIH Investment Threatens U.S. Global Competitiveness

The Sources and Uses of U.S. Science Funding
Joseph V. Kennedy
Summer 2012

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

02 Sep 2013 10:17 #2 by FredHayek
The budget hasn't actually been cut. It is just growing at a slower rate. And I am sure we will continue to see high price studies proving cocaine is addictive and fish oil is now bad for you. Or is it? Latest study criticism.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

02 Sep 2013 11:24 #3 by Blazer Bob

FredHayek wrote: The budget hasn't actually been cut. It is just growing at a slower rate. And I am sure we will continue to see high price studies proving cocaine is addictive and fish oil is now bad for you. Or is it? Latest study criticism.


This could be a corollary of "those who can, do those who can't, teach".

Those who can get jobs, those who can't get government grants.


http://www.indeed.com/jobs?q=scientists ... itle-Token

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

02 Sep 2013 11:51 #4 by LadyJazzer
Or, it could be that federal research dollars go into fighting cancer, Alzheimer's, communicable diseases, and that it's an appropriate federal expenditure, and they can make more in the government research facilities than in the private sector, (where the main focus is on sticking it to the public in the form of profits and outrageous drug-prices for years...)



"Remember when Republicans cared about ALL Americans?....... Me neither."

“Republicanism is just a political justification for being greedy, selfish and mean."

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.151 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors