I can't even see what is being done wrong here.

12 Sep 2013 07:20 #1 by The Boss
Seems like people are pretending there is an issue here so that the city can get their cut.

Random dinner parties that cost money by strangers and people know exactly what they are getting into. No reports of problems, except the govt wants its cut, you know, like the mob, but using laws and guns in stead of just guns. They want dinner parties to get health inspections.

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/09/11/ ... r-parties/

I can only assume NY has solved all its homeless, hungry, race and gun issues to have any staff or funding to focus on this.

This made me think. Many here have likely gone to someone's house for dinner and brought a dish, or even, gasp, have gone to a pot luck. As you know everything has value. If I give something to an employee, I need to figure out its value and tax them based on this (and pay unemployment, workman's comp and potentially health insurance)

Now the reason you bring something to the dinner party, in part or full, is to repay the owner for the effort and expense of hosting the party. To make it feel more even, like any trade. Thus you are compensating them, not only are they now a restaurant, but they are a business with tax obligations from the night.

Just more BS that is only acceptable because they have not enforced it yet. By the letter of the law, in NY, and many other places that have food police, it is illegal to bring a dish to a dinner party without getting health inspection, paying all appropriate taxes, getting all appropriate insurances, filing employment paperwork, etc. pretty much the 50 things you have to do to open any small business (51 next month). Again, only reason it is not a big deal it that they don't enforce it, like the $50 a day fine we have locally for peeling paint on your house or owning the wrong trash can, no issue only because no one has decided to enforce it ...yet. Well someone in NYC govt could not get into one of these dinners and ..... they need to be stopped.

Just keep this in mind as you feel law abiding, whenever you trade or give, there is a govt consequence by law. You cannot even legally have a dinner party and share the expense without govt permission or sneaking it as you all likely do now. You could even have a big christmas with your kids and end up with regulatory or tax consequences, you are just evading them.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

12 Sep 2013 07:54 #2 by FredHayek
My aunt used to run a holiday style soup kitchen that would feed the homeless but she had to shut it down. It was just too expensive to keep it up to code. Unintended consequences of keeping people safe.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

12 Sep 2013 08:00 #3 by The Boss

FredHayek wrote: My aunt used to run a holiday style soup kitchen that would feed the homeless but she had to shut it down. It was just too expensive to keep it up to code. Unintended consequences of keeping people safe.


There is a big difference between unintended and just not giving a crap. I think we whitewash the later by calling it the former. The food police where she was doing this just did not give a crap about the homeless. Let's not pretend the consequence was unintended.

The people that shut her down might as well have taken the food right out of the people's mouths as they were chewing it and that is how they should be treated, as criminals, not protectors.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.126 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+