Is this a Factcheck Bias?

I was browsing factcheck and came across this... really jumped out at me for some reason. And maybe it's just me, but isn't this factcheck trying to re-tell (in their interpretation) what Obama "really meant to say"?

So, Obama's words :

In the second debate with John McCain in 2008, Barack Obama promised, “We’re going to work with your employer to lower the cost of your premiums by up to $2,500 a year.”

http://www.redstate.com/2012/09/25/obam ... -increase/
Now this sounds like people who are employed by 50+ businesses, are the ones who this "up to $2500" savings is going to go to. Right?

Now Factcheck's interpretation:

◾Proponents say premiums will go down, while opponents say they’ll go up. In general, employer plans won’t be affected much, and a price change for individuals seeking their own insurance will vary from person to person. Obama claimed that all of the uninsured would see lower premiums than what they could get now (before accounting for federal subsidies), but that’s not the case.

Is that really all he claimed factcheck? Or isn't it a bit dishonest not to say he promised people who were employed ,in general, to get this savings as well?

Read this article and see if you can sense the bias.
http://www.factcheck.org/2013/09/obamacare-myths/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_o65vMUk5so Maybe it's just me :scared:

And read the whole thing.... and ask your own questions. What else are they intentionally leaving out or distorting?

And one more thing to think about... when was the last time you heard Obama mention these wonderful Obamamoney savings? 2009?

Liberals - when their lips are moving they're lying. And that, sir, is a fact!