Time To Decentralize?

Big Dougy wrote: Freds a moron, and then a peanut gallery of morons chime in on a moronic subject..

Thats it..This is a cess pool of human garbage

I'm sorry- I gotta go, this is embarassing

You have had more retirement tours than the Rolling Stones and the Who combined.

Big Dougy wrote: Freds (sic - grammar) a moron, and then a peanut gallery of morons chime in on a moronic subject..

Thats (sic - grammar) it..This is a cess pool (sic - spelling) of human garbage

I'm sorry- I gotta go, this is embarassing (sic - spelling)

Don't let the door knob hit you where the good lord split 'ya! Don't come back y'all, ya hear?

PS - There's a grammar/spell check feature on this site, perhaps you should familiarize yourself with it. Three sentences (while some were incomplete and lacking punctuation), four errors. I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that your first language is English; in academic circles your post wouldn't rise above an F- but do continue to berate the rest of us for being "angry backwoods old white crackers," at least we can articulate ourselves correctly in our native language.

Your good grammar will never make your bad ideology palatable.

So you're saying that the Gubment should keep on spending and taxing all the while knowing that they can't sustain that level of spending and taxation? Next time you have a five gallon bucket of water I'd like to see how you get six gallons of water out of it without adding more water. You can't tax people or seize their wealth once the Gubment already has everything they own.

I'd ask you to come around to the truth but you drank too many gallons of that Kool Aid a long time ago, even unvarnished truth can't cut through that level of brainwashing.

How nice of you to tell me what I'm saying, you're wrong, but a nice gesture none the less. I am simply saying that when you run up the charge card, be you a government or an individual, you can't cut your spending after the fact. You spent that money, don't be a dead beat and refuse to pay the bill. You can balance the budget going forward but not by refusing to pay for what you already bought.

archer wrote: How nice of you to tell me what I'm saying, you're wrong, but a nice gesture none the less. I am simply saying that when you run up the charge card, be you a government or an individual, you can't cut your spending after the fact. You spent that money, don't be a dead beat and refuse to pay the bill. You can balance the budget going forward but not by refusing to pay for what you already bought.

Amazing that you seem to agree with the GOP. That's precisely why the Republicans have tried to tie debt ceiling increases with reductions in certain taxes, retaining laws like the sequestration and the massive money pit that is the ACA.

In my opinion while their kabuki theater is more symbolic than practical (and really not good for our current economy) it does focus a light on the same thing that you are saying above.

archer wrote: Your good grammar will never make your bad ideology palatable.

This is why we use logic and numbers. Your lack of doing so makes your ideology much less palatable, in fact it makes it questionable as an ideology, it just becomes a set of wants that you find ways to get people with weapons to get for you. Perhaps that's ideal to some, certainly not me.

archer wrote: How nice of you to tell me what I'm saying, you're wrong, but a nice gesture none the less. I am simply saying that when you run up the charge card, be you a government or an individual, you can't cut your spending after the fact. You spent that money, don't be a dead beat and refuse to pay the bill. You can balance the budget going forward but not by refusing to pay for what you already bought.

We have more than enough money coming into the treasury on a weekly basis to pay all our bills which are on a charge card. We need to stop adding more to the cards, since our kids happen to be unlucky cosigners on our inability to live within our means, and keep the card in our pocket.