Millions Spent By Gates & Bloomberg On 66

05 Nov 2013 19:45 #1 by FredHayek
And it looks to be losing. Would have been better for them to splendid it on Colorado schools instead of TV time.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Nov 2013 06:52 #2 by Venturer
TV time gives them exposure. Tickled that a number of taxpayers have spoken.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Nov 2013 13:44 #3 by Nobody that matters
Does Bloomberg own any Colorado Property? He sure takes an active interest in our politics.

"Whatever you are, be a good one." ~ Abraham Lincoln

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Nov 2013 14:12 #4 by LadyJazzer
What does it matter? I thought you guys were all FOR outside spending, unlimited campaign cash, dark money, hiding the identities of heavy-hitters? What...? Are you suggesting that you like the result of "Citizens United"--but only when it's your side doing it?

Since we know that Crossroads/GPS, and all of the rest of the Koch Brothers type organizations will be sliding their dark money into the campaigns next year, why is it all of a sudden a bother for you that "$$$= free speech"? Hoisted on your own petard?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Nov 2013 14:23 #5 by FredHayek
I love outside money being spent on lost Dem causes. Leaves them less money for more realistic races.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Nov 2013 14:41 #6 by LadyJazzer
Deflect much?

Y'know, I feel the same way about right-wing outside money... How'd that Romney election work out for ya?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Nov 2013 14:48 #7 by Blazer Bob
Dark money? Does that come after the war on women? BOO!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Nov 2013 16:18 #8 by PrintSmith
A made up term coined by a "progressive" hoping to create the illusion of something that doesn't exist with the intent to cast an unfavorable light on those who do not share her ideology. That about sums up what "dark money" is.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Nov 2013 19:41 #9 by RenegadeCJ
It is interesting that money taken without permission from a worker to use for political purposes purely because a union is present is just fine. If a corporation withheld $$ without permission from an employee without a union would be criminal. Funny that LJ is fine with one, and not with another. I'm not fine with either.

Too bad future generations aren't here to see all the great things we are spending their $$ on!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.166 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+