The Nuclear Option

21 Nov 2013 12:10 #1 by Rick
The Nuclear Option was created by Rick
Do you know what this means now? Do you care?

“We can’t afford four more years of this”

Tim Walz

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Nov 2013 12:13 #2 by FredHayek
Replied by FredHayek on topic The Nuclear Option
Just a distraction from the ACA failure? That is what Rush is saying.

Just trying to make it easier to hire whacko judges. Roll with it, when the Republicans take over in 2014, we will fill the courts with libertarian, pro-2nd amendment judges that serve forever.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Nov 2013 12:20 #3 by Venturer
Replied by Venturer on topic The Nuclear Option
The Dems attempt to pass as much ludicrous legislation before they go down in flames in 2014.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Nov 2013 12:31 #4 by FredHayek
Replied by FredHayek on topic The Nuclear Option

RidgeWay wrote: The Dems attempt to pass as much ludicrous legislation before they go down in flames in 2014.

So far it only applies to nominations so now Obama can replace all the current idiots like Sebilius and Holder more easily.
And load up the courts with a bunch of left wing law school graduates since they are lifetime appointments.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Nov 2013 12:53 #5 by MamaRama
Replied by MamaRama on topic The Nuclear Option
Doesn't it mean too that he can put thru his 'gun ban' agenda?? only asking cuz I don't know, (not to start a battle...)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Nov 2013 13:23 #6 by FredHayek
Replied by FredHayek on topic The Nuclear Option
Any gun ban would be unlikely since new gun legislation would still need to get through the House.
Of course the Dems will try even harder to take the House back now.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Nov 2013 13:25 #7 by MamaRama
Replied by MamaRama on topic The Nuclear Option
Okay.. Thanks..

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Nov 2013 16:06 #8 by MamaRama
Replied by MamaRama on topic The Nuclear Option
Okay maybe somebody can answer.. If the Dems are doimg this to "stack" the deck with their Judical Picks (which I've read) does this mean when the Repub's take back the House and Senate can they then Fire or force the resignations of these Judicial Picks?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Nov 2013 16:12 #9 by Ronbo
Replied by Ronbo on topic The Nuclear Option

MamaRama wrote: Okay maybe somebody can answer.. If the Dems are doimg this to "stack" the deck with their Judical Picks (which I've read) does this mean when the Repub's take back the House and Senate can they then Fire or force the resignations of these Judicial Picks?


Nope, they are lifetime appointments. But other vacancies do come up and if the republicans control the Senate and the White House, they will be able to get their nominations through without a fight. In the long run, both sides lose as this was a check to ensure the extreems are not put into lifetime positions.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Nov 2013 16:16 #10 by MamaRama
Replied by MamaRama on topic The Nuclear Option
Gotcha. Thanks!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.171 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+