The Iranian Deal: Munich II

25 Nov 2013 14:03 #11 by Photo-fish

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Nov 2013 14:04 #12 by Photo-fish

Hippie Love Fest wrote: I would like to hear from the progressives here on this forum to list all the reasons why this is a good idea.

C'mon. Speak up. I can't hear you!


Your turn.

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Nov 2013 14:11 #13 by Photo-fish

Blazer Bob wrote:

Photo-fish wrote:

FredHayek wrote: And personally Pakistani nukes scare me more than Iranian ones.

Bingo. Why is Israel so worried when Pakistan has them too?
Didn't Israel and the Saudis just form a coalition to police the Iranians and the surrounding areas?Follow the money - This temporary agreementl will hurt Saudi oil exports and they are in cahoots with Israel right now.
This is just more sabre rattling from the spoiled child Israel IMO. Why don't they sign the Non Proliferation Treaty? They should take part themselves in the very same International Laws they ignore but want others to pay to enforce on their behalf.

Does anyone realy think Israel (or the Saudis) will let Iran develope a nuke without launchng a strike?
Does anyone really think Iran would use a nuke and NOT thinking it would be their own ending?

But if the P5+1 countries (United States, Britain, China, Russia, France and Germany) are behind this deal it must be bad right?
Or is this just bad because it is a possible chance for peace on Obama's watch? Look for the congressional conservatives to obstruct progress here as well I guess.

Remember this is ONLY a 6 month deal & the sanctions can be re-activated.


It is not just conservatives.



Your right, it's also Chuck Shumer, a few DINOS, half the jews in Israel and the Saudis.

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Nov 2013 18:28 #14 by Blazer Bob
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/ ... pP4LMSUSHw

Damn DINOS.



.."A group of top senators vowed Sunday to impose more sanctions on Iran, one day after the US and other P5+1 countries agreed to ease sanctions on the country in exchange for Iran's curbing its nuclear-enrichment program.

“A nuclear weapons-capable Iran presents a grave threat to the national security of the United States and its allies and we are committed to preventing Iran from acquiring this capability," the group said. “We will work together to reconcile Democratic and Republican proposals over the coming weeks and to pass bipartisan Iran sanctions legislation as soon as possible.”

The group of 15 senators included Democrats Bob Cardin of Maryland and Bob Menendez of New Jersey, as well as Republicans Bob Corker of Tennessee and John Cornyn of Texas."...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Nov 2013 21:07 #15 by otisptoadwater
Do a quick Google search on the short lifespan of Iranian nuclear scientists and you'll likely arrive here:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/haggai-carmon/iran-nuclear-scientist-killed_b_1206591.html

Killing the kids that are fueling the Iranian nuke program isn't stopping Iran from moving forward but it is slowing things down. Of course none of these incidents are officially supported by any nation, they are "accidents" so why should anyone ask for more details?

I personally think our elected officials are playing with fire while holding an open can of gasoline and splashing the contents around liberally. Sure it's a six month approval, at least until the Iranians decide to do what ever they want on the day after the agreement expires.

If you take the time to read the article I posted the link to (love the Huffing and Puffington post when they go against their own kind) you might notice that some North Koreans were killed in Iran. No collaboration between Iran and North Korea in developing nukes?

I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.

"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Nov 2013 21:39 #16 by Hippie Love Fest

Photo-fish wrote:

Hippie Love Fest wrote: I would like to hear from the progressives here on this forum to list all the reasons why this is a good idea.

C'mon. Speak up. I can't hear you!


Your turn.



You got it...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Nov 2013 21:59 #17 by Rick
Replied by Rick on topic The Iranian Deal: Munich II
lol :like:

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Nov 2013 22:16 #18 by Hippie Love Fest
...a picture is worth a thousand words.

This is total insanity.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Nov 2013 22:48 #19 by Hippie Love Fest
...I guess this is what Barry meant when he told Putin he'd be more "flexible" after the next election????

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

26 Nov 2013 07:05 #20 by FredHayek
There are a lot of American and European companies who would benefit from an easing of sanctions.
Will the West choose profit over integrity?

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.157 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+