- Posts: 2211
- Thank you received: 5
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Rick wrote: The request SC, is that we have a Pinocchio emoticon.
The idea is that we use the emoticon to play a little game just to change this up a bit.
So here's how it works (suggestions welcome)... we post just like normal; whatever seems like a relevant or interesting topic. Since we basically call each other liars everyday anyway, why not have a BS rating thread? Someone posts and others either post agree or ignore.... or they post a Pinocchio rating of 1-5. They must explain the rating using whatever sources they want or none at all, being aware that no source means no credibily to counter said Pinocchios. The OP can then counter with other evidence or rational explanation. Then the critic is allowed the last word... then it's over. Obviously, once a debate starts, it shouldn't be interupted as just a general courtesy. Others could then chime in until someone else starts another one... once a rating and justification are posted the debate is started and the poster gets the next word.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Where are you mother archer? Look at all the bad words your VL is using... you should be outraged! lolSuper Malta wrote:
Rick wrote: The request SC, is that we have a Pinocchio emoticon.
The idea is that we use the emoticon to play a little game just to change this up a bit.
So here's how it works (suggestions welcome)... we post just like normal; whatever seems like a relevant or interesting topic. Since we basically call each other liars everyday anyway, why not have a BS rating thread? Someone posts and others either post agree or ignore.... or they post a Pinocchio rating of 1-5. They must explain the rating using whatever sources they want or none at all, being aware that no source means no credibily to counter said Pinocchios. The OP can then counter with other evidence or rational explanation. Then the critic is allowed the last word... then it's over. Obviously, once a debate starts, it shouldn't be interupted as just a general courtesy. Others could then chime in until someone else starts another one... once a rating and justification are posted the debate is started and the poster gets the next word.
WTH?
I'm no doctor, but I did get a B in PSY 101 at Red Rocks last fall, and this mess looks like it was written by someone with a full blown case of AIDS related psychosis which is obviously exacerbated by a chronic masturbation disorder.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.