I think that for any graph to be meaningful both axis need to be labeled.What is the numerical denomination of population? your neighborhood? state? 100's? 1000's 1,000,000's?
Once the extended unemployment benefits expire, it may really change your statistics.
fly off the handle wrote: We're aging, your point?
try a link next time or is this your "work"?
I hate lazy posters
Wow... there must have been a lot of "aging" going on between 2008-2010. Do a little work yourself. If you had hovered over the graph, you would have known where it came from. Are you too old and arthritic to move the mouse? Talk about lazy.
Blondie wrote: I think that for any graph to be meaningful both axis need to be labeled.What is the numerical denomination of population? your neighborhood? state? 100's? 1000's 1,000,000's?
Once the extended unemployment benefits expire, it may really change your statistics.
It's not my statistics, it's the Bush era, Obama era statistics.
Blondie wrote: I think that for any graph to be meaningful both axis need to be labeled.What is the numerical denomination of population? your neighborhood? state? 100's? 1000's 1,000,000's?
Once the extended unemployment benefits expire, it may really change your statistics.
It's not my statistics, it's the Bush era, Obama era statistics.
It will be interesting to see what happens. Tens of millions of baby boomers retiring and the people expected to fund the Social Security for them don't have jobs or their jobs are low income and they themselves are also receiving benefits like SNAP and/or Earned Income Tax Credits.
And this isn't only a problem in the states, Europe and Japan were already seeing it since they reached zero population growth sooner than America.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Walter L Newton wrote: If you had hovered over the graph, you would have known where it came from. Are you too old and arthritic to move the mouse? Talk about lazy.
Thank you for the link, I hovered, I double clicked, nothing. I am not as old as you nor arthritic. As a correspondent, shouldn't you do the work, convincingly?
