- Posts: 7163
- Thank you received: 21
Topic Author
IRS Proposes New Regulations Governing Political Activities of 501(c)(4) Organizations
The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service recently issued initial guidance regarding qualification requirements for tax-exemption as a social welfare organization under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. This proposed guidance defines the term “candidate-related political activity,” and would amend current regulations by indicating that the promotion of social welfare does not include this type of activity. The proposed guidance also seeks initial comments on other aspects of the qualification requirements, including what proportion of a 501(c)(4) organization’s activities must promote social welfare.
There are a number of steps in the regulatory process that must be taken before any final guidance can be issued. Given the significant public interest in these and related issues, Treasury and the IRS expect to receive a large number of comments.
“This is part of ongoing efforts within the IRS that are improving our work in the tax-exempt area,” said IRS Acting Commissioner Danny Werfel. “Once final, this proposed guidance will continue moving us forward and provide clarity for this important segment of exempt organizations.”
Organizations may apply for tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(4) of the tax code if they operate to promote social welfare. The IRS currently applies a “facts and circumstances” test to determine whether an organization is engaged in political campaign activities that do not promote social welfare. The newly proposed guidance would reduce the need to conduct fact-intensive inquiries by replacing the “facts and circumstances” test with more definitive rules.
http://www.nonprofitcpa.com/irs-propose ... nizations/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Congress? Who needs Congress? The King has a pen and a phone, he can fix it tonight!LOL wrote: It sounds to me like the law was too vague and needs congress to act and clarify, not a bunch of bureaucrats writing regs.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.