homeagain wrote: AND possible has a VESTED FINANCIAL interest in the drug.....can you confirm or deny that
factor,because it makes an enormous difference in the context of the issue.....
Do you have something other than an attempt to besmirch the author that suggests that possibility home? I thought not. Smear tactics such as these should be beneath you home. I mean, I expect them from the trolls like Jazzer, but I thought you better than to attempt to employ them yourself.
homeagain wrote: AND possible has a VESTED FINANCIAL interest in the drug.....can you confirm or deny that
factor,because it makes an enormous difference in the context of the issue.....
Do you have something other than an attempt to besmirch the author that suggests that possibility home? I thought not. Smear tactics such as these should be beneath you home. I mean, I expect them from the trolls like Jazzer, but I thought you better than to attempt to employ them yourself.
NOT a smear tactic,but rather a VALID question.....If the writer has stock in the company/ANY
affiliation....financial or otherwise.....the POV is then biased.....as I have stated before, I
ATTEMPT to be informed and do research.....THIS question REQUIRES research before it can be
accepted as a VALID position.
Valid why? Because you asked it? Give me something that establishes that it is a valid question instead of an attempt to make someone prove a negative home. In other words, show that there is reason to question his integrity instead of attempting to make his integrity an issue sans any evidence there is reason to question it.
