HYPOCRISY Defined

28 Mar 2014 17:36 #11 by Blazer Bob
Replied by Blazer Bob on topic HYPOCRISY Defined

otisptoadwater wrote:

BlazerBob wrote: I thought the same think while reading a left wing thread where they are having orgasims over Christy while ignoring the cover ups of the administration.


Leave it to me to jump ahead a few posts and derail this thread, my apologies in advance for taking this discussion off track.

Who allegedly committed the bigger faux pas? Christy made a few thousand people slightly late for dinner. Barry and Hillary knew that the US Consulate in Benghazi had security problems months in advance of it being over run and four American Citizens lost their lives because the security issues where acknowledged but not fixed.

Having to sit on a bridge for a few minutes in New Jersey sounds punishing but it bears no comparison to four American Citizens losing their lives.


Jumping a few more ahead, the dead in Benghazi are just a small deal even if one was an ambassador.

The bigger picture is the hand of the fed imposing tyranny on the entire nation. Even the President and his minions know it is wrong. That is why they shut their eyes and claim bullshit.

[youtube] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr5On1zRWuY [/youtube]

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Mar 2014 11:07 #12 by Rick
Replied by Rick on topic HYPOCRISY Defined

archer wrote: Rick, you would be far more likely to get a reasonable discussion with a reasonable title. ,

Oh, you mean like this one from your friend Dog?

"Our local conservatives must be so proud"

Can you find me even a scrap of honesty in that title? At least my title can be proven with facts (unless you want to argue the definition of hypocrisy).

Oh wait, the fact that you have a problem with my title but not Dog's is in fact...










HYPOCRISY :LMAO: Hope you're having a good weekend btw :HappyWave:

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Mar 2014 11:19 #13 by archer
Replied by archer on topic HYPOCRISY Defined
Well there ya go.....the dog did it too, really Rick isn't it time you started thinking for yourself instead of modeling your posts after LJ and dog?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Mar 2014 11:37 #14 by Rick
Replied by Rick on topic HYPOCRISY Defined

archer wrote: Well there ya go.....the dog did it too, really Rick isn't it time you started thinking for yourself instead of modeling your posts after LJ and dog?

So in other words, you require a much higher standard from me than you do the two people who you are friends with and agree with 99% of the time. I still stand by my title unless you can show me where hypocrisy does not apply in my example.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Mar 2014 12:07 #15 by archer
Replied by archer on topic HYPOCRISY Defined

Rick wrote:

archer wrote: Well there ya go.....the dog did it too, really Rick isn't it time you started thinking for yourself instead of modeling your posts after LJ and dog?

So in other words, you require a much higher standard from me than you do the two people who you are friends with and agree with 99% of the time. I still stand by my title unless you can show me where hypocrisy does not apply in my example.

Nice try, you have stated in the past how much you dislike the posting style of some liberal posters, then proceeded to post just as they do, as do many of your buddies, I personally don't care how you post, just don't tell is you hate that kind of posting if that is the kind of poster you aspire to be. I'm sorry you can't see what I'm trying to convey, so I'll shut up now (that should make you happy)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Mar 2014 12:24 #16 by Rick
Replied by Rick on topic HYPOCRISY Defined

archer wrote:

Rick wrote:

archer wrote: Well there ya go.....the dog did it too, really Rick isn't it time you started thinking for yourself instead of modeling your posts after LJ and dog?

So in other words, you require a much higher standard from me than you do the two people who you are friends with and agree with 99% of the time. I still stand by my title unless you can show me where hypocrisy does not apply in my example.

Nice try, you have stated in the past how much you dislike the posting style of some liberal posters, then proceeded to post just as they do, as do many of your buddies, I personally don't care how you post, just don't tell is you hate that kind of posting if that is the kind of poster you aspire to be. I'm sorry you can't see what I'm trying to convey, so I'll shut up now (that should make you happy)

On the contrary archer, I want to understand why my title is somehow a lie or misleading? Is there another definition of hypocrisy that I should be aware of? Nothing in my title or in the body of my post has been discredited yet, you are free to take a stab at it.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.168 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+