- Posts: 10451
- Thank you received: 70
otisptoadwater wrote:
BlazerBob wrote: I thought the same think while reading a left wing thread where they are having orgasims over Christy while ignoring the cover ups of the administration.
Leave it to me to jump ahead a few posts and derail this thread, my apologies in advance for taking this discussion off track.
Who allegedly committed the bigger faux pas? Christy made a few thousand people slightly late for dinner. Barry and Hillary knew that the US Consulate in Benghazi had security problems months in advance of it being over run and four American Citizens lost their lives because the security issues where acknowledged but not fixed.
Having to sit on a bridge for a few minutes in New Jersey sounds punishing but it bears no comparison to four American Citizens losing their lives.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Oh, you mean like this one from your friend Dog?archer wrote: Rick, you would be far more likely to get a reasonable discussion with a reasonable title. ,
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
So in other words, you require a much higher standard from me than you do the two people who you are friends with and agree with 99% of the time. I still stand by my title unless you can show me where hypocrisy does not apply in my example.archer wrote: Well there ya go.....the dog did it too, really Rick isn't it time you started thinking for yourself instead of modeling your posts after LJ and dog?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Nice try, you have stated in the past how much you dislike the posting style of some liberal posters, then proceeded to post just as they do, as do many of your buddies, I personally don't care how you post, just don't tell is you hate that kind of posting if that is the kind of poster you aspire to be. I'm sorry you can't see what I'm trying to convey, so I'll shut up now (that should make you happy)Rick wrote:
So in other words, you require a much higher standard from me than you do the two people who you are friends with and agree with 99% of the time. I still stand by my title unless you can show me where hypocrisy does not apply in my example.archer wrote: Well there ya go.....the dog did it too, really Rick isn't it time you started thinking for yourself instead of modeling your posts after LJ and dog?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
On the contrary archer, I want to understand why my title is somehow a lie or misleading? Is there another definition of hypocrisy that I should be aware of? Nothing in my title or in the body of my post has been discredited yet, you are free to take a stab at it.archer wrote:
Nice try, you have stated in the past how much you dislike the posting style of some liberal posters, then proceeded to post just as they do, as do many of your buddies, I personally don't care how you post, just don't tell is you hate that kind of posting if that is the kind of poster you aspire to be. I'm sorry you can't see what I'm trying to convey, so I'll shut up now (that should make you happy)Rick wrote:
So in other words, you require a much higher standard from me than you do the two people who you are friends with and agree with 99% of the time. I still stand by my title unless you can show me where hypocrisy does not apply in my example.archer wrote: Well there ya go.....the dog did it too, really Rick isn't it time you started thinking for yourself instead of modeling your posts after LJ and dog?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.