Nope, I think they are very related. A majority of Americans don't want ACA, but it is still the law of the land.
A majority of Americans and the world think photo ID's should be required at polling places and instead a few liberal judges are denying the will of the people.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
LadyJazzer wrote: And a few states have had their unconstitutional requirements declared invalid. (Not to mention their unconstitutional abortion requirements...)
:woo hoo: :HappyWave: :ThumbsUp: :rofllol
Rogue judges are the last defense of parties that lose elections.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
How'd that 2008 and 2012 work out for ya? I can hardly wait until 2016... You may pick up a few in 2014, but in 2016, the teabaggers are toast... :rofllol
You predicted the GOP was dead in 2008, how did that turn out for you? You have been predicting the TEA Party was dead for years and it just hasn't happened. Maybe if you read more diverse sources than Mother Jones you might be a little more clued in.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Is that your deflection-of-the-day? I'm still waiting for PROOF that anyone from those two states has attempted to vote in both states... A photo-ID wouldn't stop it if they did....
Perhaps you could explain to us how a photo-ID could be used to stop it...?
:Snooze
I'm still waiting. I'll be right here. C'mon, Fred. Turn on that laserlike focus and tell us how a photo-ID would stop the scenario you posited....
Why are you so scared of photo ID? Did you commit a horrible crime you are a fugitive from? Photo ID tells business and government who you are, your age and legal residence. Example, a photo ID for a 16 year old would show the election judge that Lady Jazzer Jr. can not legally vote.
Or if your photo ID shows that your legal address is Montreal Quebec, then you can not vote in Colorado elections.
Of course LJ's party in Colorado think you should be able to establish residency just by saying I do intend to move to Boulder, so I should be able to vote there.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Perhaps you could explain to us how a photo-ID could be used to stop it...?
:Snooze
I'm still waiting. Keep deflecting, and dodging. I'll be right here. C'mon, Fred. Turn on that laserlike focus and tell us how a photo-ID would stop the scenario you posited....
(Of course, we all know it's not just "Photo-ID"...It's the list of all of the photo-ID's that will no longer be accepted: Gun permit: OK; Veteran ID: not acceptable; Student ID: not acceptable...Birth Certificate: not acceptable in some states without a certified copy of a marriage license--[for women-only], ad nauseum)
Another example. I have property in two counties but legally reside in only one county. Under your system, I can take the utility bills from both counties and vote in both elections. Under my better system, my photo ID shows my legal address.
Irony? Your system makes it easier for the rich to cheat on elections.
So thank you loose cannon judges for making it easier for Republicans to steal elections. Imagine how many counties the Koch brothers could vote in?
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
