My own belief is that the surest way to send the message that things are going to change is to change the leadership which organized and participated in the logjam that those on the other side of the aisle seem intent on saddling only one party with.
With that as an accepted premise, who should the new Republican majority in the Senate choose to be what Cory Gardner would call the head of the spear?
I'd love to see a non-establishment leader replace Mitch, but I haven't thought about who yet. But just seeing Harry go the way of Pelosi is good enough for me, for now.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.