Huffington Post Will Only Cover Trump On The Entertainment Pages.

Think this is unfair? Especially when he is leading the polling for the GOP? Sounds like they are editorializing on the news pages.

If Trump gets the nomination, the entire republican party deserves to be covered only in the entertainment section.

Nobody that matters wrote: If Trump gets the nomination, the entire republican party deserves to be covered only in the entertainment section.

And what will it say about the Democratic party of Hillary is the nominee? She's definitely more calculated in what comes out of her mouth, but the evidence that she is an untrustworthy liar is overwhelming (for those who have eyes that see).

Rick wrote: And what will it say about the Democratic party of Hillary is the nominee?

It says "Oh what the hell, she's a liar and snake like the rest of 'em, but at least she ain't a socialist."

Actually, she's proposing some tax hikes which most peeps around here automatically associate with socialism, hahahahaha. That said, it was reported recently that Canada is the most respected country IN THE WORLD, and their citizens are some of the happiest and they're all socialist so perhaps our dumb arses should take a play out of their play book? Hmmmmm. Hillary is a vile witch from hell however and Donald Trump should be laughed out of every room he enters.

I find it hilarious that the same people being crushed by Big Oil, Big Pharma and Big Corp all want to continue the same retarded crap.

Jekyll wrote: it was reported recently that Canada is the most respected country IN THE WORLD, and their citizens are some of the happiest and they're all socialist

Canadians are all socialist?

Please explain.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

Deduce for yourself.

So I misspoke saying they're ALL socialist, because there are provinces governed by the French whereas most of it is governed by the British. However, with that said, people are encouraged to put into their economy with hard work with the promise of having various umbrellas. Either way, this is getting off topic and it should be noted in the first few lines on Wiki that there is not one sole type of socialism, so, deduce away. It's ran and owned by the people, not entirely owned by a central government which would imply "communism."

Wanted to make sure I cited what I said in my first post as well, so as to not look like a liar.

www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/a...K-fail-crack-10.html