My dad is still in mourning about the epic Hillary loss but I was able to have a civil discussion about the Affordable Care Act, which has proven to be anything but affordable for my middle class family. Like so many others on the left, my dad stated that the ACA wasn't what Democrats really wanted because they really don't like the idea of insurance for health care. Like so many others I've talked to on the left, the real goal is universal coverage.
I don't want to argue about whether this government bureaucracy could pull it off (which I don't believe considering the failure of the VA), but I do have a couple questions for those of you who do.
1. If government run health care for all is the best solution and the Democrats are the one's who would be the best at building the system, then why was it never proposed to the people?
2. If we did have a universal health care system, who would be able to access it? Everybody or just US citizens?
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
Give your dad a hug for me, it sounds like he needs some extra support.
To answer your thoughtful questions:
1. While I would agree that the government probably isn't the best at running this, I also don't think that private enterprise has done a bang-up job either so the bureaucrats may as well make a go of it. I'm not sure what you mean by it being proposed to the people? Should it have been a Constitutional Amendment we all voted on or do you mean something else?
2. I think everyone should have access. You can't say "Americans only" because there are people here visiting for tourism, on student and work visas, and yes, those who are here illegally. It's inhumane to turn them away if they need medical attention. I don't know what the answer is for payment/covering costs but going by the old adage of a society is judged by how it treats its young and its elderly, I can't condone not treating those who don't fit a "category" for something that should be a basic right.
I ran across this editorial today and thought it might fit. I found it a good read anyway. My former PCP moved out of the group practice last year that he had been in since we moved here and is now practicing the direct primary care this physician recommends as one solution. He felt compelled to leave because he wasn't getting to spend the time he thought it necessary to provide the best care for his patients, and was tired of fighting with insurance companies for tests and procedures he ordered. After some agonized debate, hubby and I opted not to follow our beloved PCP only because times are tight with 2 kids and his company's insurance is amazing - we can't afford to be paying out of pocket for everything even if it is better care, better quality visits, and a doctor we loved and trusted. Maine Voices: The problem isn’t Obamacare; it’s the insurance companies
By Cathleen London Special to the Portland Press Herald
November 28
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
ScienceChic wrote: I'm not sure what you mean by it being proposed to the people? Should it have been a Constitutional Amendment we all voted on or do you mean something else?
What I mean is this, just tell us want you really want and let us decide if it's what we want to. If you'll recall, Obama spent a whole lot of time talking about fixing the healthcare problem before and after the election. We know he wanted single payer because he's said it in the past along with so many other Democrats.... so why not even mention it? I believe the only logical reason they didn't is because they knew it would be rejected like hot garbage. We already have a single payer system in effect now, it's called the Veterans Administration and that has been an inept agency for decades. The VA handles about 9 million vets and about 6 million actual patients. I don't think it takes much more than a grade school level of common sense to believe the creating another system that handles 320 million Americans plus everyone else that enters legally and illegally will be beyond what this government could handle.
As far as the ACA goes, the architects and Democrats in general had to either be really really bad at math and had no common sense, or they knew the math didn't add up and expected the eventual collapse. I don't believe Dems and Obama are that stupid... I believe they knew this was the best way to get w\hat they wanted eventually and they could be seen as heroes for riding in with single payer to save us from the evil insurance companies (who by the way were promised a many more policies if they went along).
What the Dems never did was look to the root cause of high insurance, which happens to be high medical costs. That's like putting a bigger furnace in your house instead of fixing the gaping hole in your wall.
Bottom line for me is that this whole thing was created through dishonesty, and if that's not the case then in was incompetence. Fortunately for the American people, their arrogance prevented them from envisioning a Republican House, Senate, and Presidency before the inevitable collapse of the horrible bill.
I'll address your #2 when I have time.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
I believe it is a step stone to single payer. When record numbers of people were disliking it, those on the right said it went too far and those on the left said it didn't go far enough.
I am curious to see what the Republicans will keep and what they will throw out.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.