Hypocrisy at the Supreme Court

  • Mountain Legend
  • Mountain Legend
  • Posts: 375
  • Thank you received: 14
  • Gender: Unknown
  • Birthdate: Unknown
ramage created the topic: Hypocrisy at the Supreme Court 12 Dec 2017 17:24 #1

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, during her entire 24+ yr stint on the Supreme Court has never had a Black or Hispanic/Latino law clerk. She is a proponent of affirmative action for thee but not for me. For more information please go to Law.com and read the article by Tony Mauro 12/12/17. It is behind a firewall and you will have to pay for access.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Happy Camper
  • Happy Camper
  • Posts: 42
  • Thank you received: 5
  • Gender: Unknown
  • Birthdate: Unknown
Carrie replied the topic: Hypocrisy at the Supreme Court 21 Feb 2018 23:10 #2

When the Republicans refused to interview Obama's choice for Supreme Court Justice at the death of Justice Scalia until after the elections, each should have been tried for treason. It was, at the least, derelection of duty.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Mountain Legend
  • Mountain Legend
  • Posts: 18573
  • Thank you received: 44
  • Gender: Unknown
  • Birthdate: Unknown
FredHayek replied the topic: Hypocrisy at the Supreme Court 22 Feb 2018 08:34 #3

If we impeached everyone in the government who did not do their job in a timely manner, DC would be empty. :happyprez:


#35

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Mountain Legend
  • Mountain Legend
  • Posts: 8632
  • Thank you received: 55
  • Gender: Unknown
  • Birthdate: Unknown
Rick replied the topic: Hypocrisy at the Supreme Court 24 Feb 2018 09:16 #4

Carrie wrote: When the Republicans refused to interview Obama's choice for Supreme Court Justice at the death of Justice Scalia until after the elections, each should have been tried for treason. It was, at the least, derelection of duty.

Tell me honestly, if that old nut Ginsberg dies in the last 6 months of Trump's term, would you be ok with Trump nominating a conservative and would you not want the next president to make that decision based on the election?

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Happy Camper
  • Happy Camper
  • Posts: 42
  • Thank you received: 5
  • Gender: Unknown
  • Birthdate: Unknown
Carrie replied the topic: Hypocrisy at the Supreme Court 24 Feb 2018 09:58 #5

I would at least expect them to interview the nominee and then see how many agree with the responses. No, I don't want uninformed Tramp making ANY decisions, but there is a protocol and a process, whether or not I agree with it. At the least, do your duty and your job--they failed.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.251 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

login here...

sponsors
© My Mountain Town      Site powered by C☆C☆S
Google+