I’d be onboard with that age limit. We also need term limits implemented for Congress.
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
towermonkey wrote: I completely agree with that. It will never happen because they'd have to term limit themselves, but it needs to happen.
Other than the fact that the foxes will never vote to give up control of the hen house I seem to recall that both term limits and a line item veto were voted into law some time ago. Both were found unconstitutional.
Yes, unconstitutional without an amendment which requires 2/3rds. It will never happen without a constitutional convention and then still requires 2/3rds of state legislatures.
