- Posts: 157
- Thank you received: 16
ScienceChic wrote: I do hope you are referring to one of the Trump kids running in 2024 and not DJT, because that would be a violation of the Constitution.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
"Do they have a heartbeat?" TM, I'm a little at a loss for words here. An embryo that is implanted in a woman's uterus is a ball of 2-8 cells, how in the bloody hell could it possibly have a heart, or a body to contain said heart, in order to have a heartbeat??? A heart itself is comprised of 2x10^9 cells, fyi. You couldn't transplant a fetus that size into a woman's uterus and expect it to survive, it would've had to have been incubated somewhere for weeks and that technology does not exist (and if it did, a woman's body wouldn't be necessary at that point).towermonkey wrote: Of course I was echoing Trump's joke on the matter of 2024. We all know only democrats get to stay in office longer than two terms...<cough> FDR <cough>. As to IVF, I didn't realize it had become an industry like that. Those embryos should be made? Built? not sure what the right word is, only on an as needed basis. One thing I couldn't find in trying to research when these embryos are destroyed was when. Do they have a heartbeat? If so, they should be governed by these laws as that is the one thing that all of the laws had in common. I am pro life to the core, but agree with you that other means should be used to decrease abortions. Laws should be the last thing tried.
If we truly -- truly -- believe in the sacredness of life, then we must every single day work to build a civilization where ALL people are valued, where ALL members have access and opportunity without regard to their differences.
If you truly believe that new life to be sacred -- sacred -- do we not then have an obligation both as a nation and as a people to provide for that life? To provide the best possible environment, the possible best future, no matter the expense?
If you TRULY believe human life to be sacred, then it's not enough to demand every conception be carried to term and every baby be born.
No.
If you truly value human life, then you must build a world where that life is truly valued, encouraged and celebrated for itself.
If you allow no exemptions for rape, then you are morally obligated to work diligently and aggressively to ensure rape does not happen. You must change society, you must change how we think, you must change the entrenched power structure, you must change how we see each other. No exceptions. No excuses.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please consider this, yes, half that baby is the rapist, but half that baby is also your daughter. Would you extend that to born babies too? Infanticide is legal if the child was conceived during rape? How many children who were conceived during rape wish their mom had aborted them?homeagain wrote: In what sane universe would an incest victim or rape victim be INCLUDED within this law????
WTF.....and IF HER daughter was raped,she would insist on full term delivery and keep the child?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The is no D stance or R stance, only individual stances. I'm pretty sure even liberals don't walk the exact same line when it comes to when you can kill an unborn human being. Personally I think it's one of humanity's worst accomplishments but we figured how to do it and now we all get to choose how we individually feel about it.homeagain wrote: www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/5/1...n-ban-hyde-amendment
HERE is the D'S STANCE.........anyone wish to post the complete R'S stance?
and in answer to the previous post.........INCEST is included within your stance?? May you "return" as a woman in your NEXT life and find YOUR future includes a hideous and unspeakable violation of YOUR body,mind and soul......perhaps your position on this topic will be different when it is YOUR experience, jmo
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
homeagain wrote: www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/5/1...n-ban-hyde-amendment
HERE is the D'S STANCE.........anyone wish to post the complete R'S stance?
and in answer to the previous post.........INCEST is included within your stance?? May you "return" as a woman in your NEXT life and find YOUR future includes a hideous and unspeakable violation of YOUR body,mind and soul......perhaps your position on this topic will be different when it is YOUR experience, jmo
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
homeagain wrote: www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/5/1...n-ban-hyde-amendment
HERE is the D'S STANCE.........anyone wish to post the complete R'S stance?
and in answer to the previous post.........INCEST is included within your stance?? May you "return" as a woman in your NEXT life and find YOUR future includes a hideous and unspeakable violation of YOUR body,mind and soul......perhaps your position on this topic will be different when it is YOUR experience, jmo
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.