Subpoena Contempt

Rick wrote: If Trump had a secret server that he used for government business and decided to delete tens of thousand of emails which were under congressional subpoena, would that be considered "subpoena contempt"? This is a pretty easy one to answer is you have an honest bone in your body..

THIS is a perfect picture of ignorance or denial....OMG does the collective NOT read./research?
The statement is proof positive the collective is **********.......

The White House Chief of Staff (Acting) has defied a Congressional subpoena. Is this a defensible action? What should Congress now do?

White House acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney defied a subpoena issued by House Democrats overnight that sought to compel his testimony in the impeachment inquiry on Friday, skipping his deposition.

www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/mick-mul...r-BBWteIt?li=BBnb7Kz

1. Yes
2. Go to court and present your case for the supoena.

homeagain wrote:

Rick wrote: If Trump had a secret server that he used for government business and decided to delete tens of thousand of emails which were under congressional subpoena, would that be considered "subpoena contempt"? This is a pretty easy one to answer is you have an honest bone in your body..

THIS is a perfect picture of ignorance or denial....OMG does the collective NOT read./research?
The statement is proof positive the collective is **********.......

What is ignorant about what I said? Are you saying the Hillary did not have a secret server that she used in part for government business? Are you saying she didn't delete 33,000 emails, destroy her devices, and bleachbit her secret server? Are you really saying that Trump wouldn't have been destroyed if he had done the same thing? Please, I'm begging you to give me something more than insults and the usual claim that I haven't done my research. I'm willing to debate these points... ARE YOU?

Rick wrote:

homeagain wrote:

Rick wrote: If Trump had a secret server that he used for government business and decided to delete tens of thousand of emails which were under congressional subpoena, would that be considered "subpoena contempt"? This is a pretty easy one to answer is you have an honest bone in your body..

THIS is a perfect picture of ignorance or denial....OMG does the collective NOT read./research?
The statement is proof positive the collective is **********.......

What is ignorant about what I said? Are you saying the Hillary did not have a secret server that she used in part for government business? Are you saying she didn't delete 33,000 emails, destroy her devices, and bleachbit her secret server? Are you really saying that Trump wouldn't have been destroyed if he had done the same thing? Please, I'm begging you to give me something more than insults and the usual claim that I haven't done my research. I'm willing to debate these points... ARE YOU?

thehill.com/opinion/white-house/465883-w...et-government-server

TRUMP SURREPTITIOUSLY HID (no he did not delete)information that should have been
given to congress....he THOUGHT this action would not be discovered and his quid pro quo
strong arming would success. Much to his surprise, MANY integrity driven individuals were
in strong disagreement with his actions....they were alarmed and rightfully so. THUS the
present p.o.s that is swirling around in the toilet bowl.....just like the theft from charities for
his own gain....we have a horror of a human being for our leader.

In fairness.... THIS fubar is not clearly defined in the Constitution,because the framers never
anticipated the audacious actions of a mob boss......AGAIN, THE FOURTH TURNING....legal
actions against corruption is at the fore front....HOW do we restore integrity, honesty and
honor to this nation.....OR do we let lawlessness prevail?

Why is it that you can never answer my questions. You say I'm ignorant but can't refute my statements, you just deflect to Trump. Lets address what Hillary did and ask yourself whether or not you would be concerned at all if Trump did what Hillary did., If you're willing and able to that, I will address your comments about Trump. Deal?

IF TRUMP HAD A SECRET SERVER FOR GOV. BUSINESS....I answered your question in spades.....your tendency to overlook the obvious is tiresome.

homeagain wrote: IF TRUMP HAD A SECRET SERVER FOR GOV. BUSINESS....I answered your question in spades.....your tendency to overlook the obvious is tiresome.

No, you really didn't. Lets try an easier yes or no question
If Trump did the exact same thing as Hillary did, would that be a problem for you?
Yes or no?

Rick wrote:

homeagain wrote: IF TRUMP HAD A SECRET SERVER FOR GOV. BUSINESS....I answered your question in spades.....your tendency to overlook the obvious is tiresome.

No, you really didn't. Lets try an easier yes or no question
If Trump did the exact same thing as Hillary did, would that be a problem for you?
Yes or no?

[/b]

It has already been researched,investigated and reviewed to death....I will not post a reference,
THERE WAS NO ILLEGAL activity found, some things SHOULD have been reviewed and
revised within the parameters. I have a VERY REAL PROBLEM with Hillary for an entirely
different reason. The f**k up with Benegazhi.

THE KING on the flip side, was purposely hiding email threads and I have already detailed that in another post. I have a problem with BOTH sides of the political spectrum, so your assumptions are many.....however they are incorrect.

homeagain wrote:

Rick wrote:

homeagain wrote: IF TRUMP HAD A SECRET SERVER FOR GOV. BUSINESS....I answered your question in spades.....your tendency to overlook the obvious is tiresome.

No, you really didn't. Lets try an easier yes or no question
If Trump did the exact same thing as Hillary did, would that be a problem for you?
Yes or no?

[/b]

It has already been researched,investigated and reviewed to death....I will not post a reference,
THERE WAS NO ILLEGAL activity found, some things SHOULD have been reviewed and
revised within the parameters. I have a VERY REAL PROBLEM with Hillary for an entirely
different reason. The f**k up with Benegazhi.

THE KING on the flip side, was purposely hiding email threads and I have already detailed that in another post. I have a problem with BOTH sides of the political spectrum, so your assumptions are many.....however they are incorrect.

Who investigated Hillary and was that "investigation" on par with how Trump gets investigation? You know the answer if you're honest.