FOX finds fault

thehill.com/homenews/media/470652-bret-b...ticle-of-impeachment


WHAT FUN......Fox declares the king's actions as impeachable.....truth stranger than fiction..... who knew?

It's called reporting.

Blazer Bob wrote: It's called reporting.

Something the left is not capable of doing. And that's not an impeachable offense HA, sorry.

HA, if you actually stepped out of your echo chamber and watched Fox, you'd see that there's plenty of non-conservative leftist voices arguing their side. They are the most balanced because there is near zero balance in the rest of the media. I know this because I actually watch and read more leftist media than I do Fox.

Rick wrote: HA, if you actually stepped out of your echo chamber and watched Fox, you'd see that there's plenty of non-conservative leftist voices arguing their side. They are the most balanced because there is near zero balance in the rest of the media. I know this because I actually watch and read more leftist media than I do Fox.

I'm sorry...you forget...it was NOT always that way....HANNITY is the quasi secy. of state, Rush is
a die hard TRUMPER.....it was ONLY after some individuals started actually reporting of facts
that the change occurred...how do I know this. because the king,himself, CALLED OUT FOX
for not being supportive enough (loyal) and his poor feelings were injured.

homeagain wrote:

Rick wrote: HA, if you actually stepped out of your echo chamber and watched Fox, you'd see that there's plenty of non-conservative leftist voices arguing their side. They are the most balanced because there is near zero balance in the rest of the media. I know this because I actually watch and read more leftist media than I do Fox.

I'm sorry...you forget...it was NOT always that way....HANNITY is the quasi secy. of state, Rush is
a die hard TRUMPER.....it was ONLY after some individuals started actually reporting of facts
that the change occurred...how do I know this. because the king,himself, CALLED OUT FOX
for not being supportive enough (loyal) and his poor feelings were injured.

The fact is, FOX has always given the left a voice on most of their programs where as the other networks rarely do unless its some squishy wimp like John Kasich or others who they know won't push conservative ideology too far.

Rick wrote:

homeagain wrote:

Rick wrote: HA, if you actually stepped out of your echo chamber and watched Fox, you'd see that there's plenty of non-conservative leftist voices arguing their side. They are the most balanced because there is near zero balance in the rest of the media. I know this because I actually watch and read more leftist media than I do Fox.

I'm sorry...you forget...it was NOT always that way....HANNITY is the quasi secy. of state, Rush is
a die hard TRUMPER.....it was ONLY after some individuals started actually reporting of facts
that the change occurred...how do I know this. because the king,himself, CALLED OUT FOX
for not being supportive enough (loyal) and his poor feelings were injured.

The fact is, FOX has always given the left a voice on most of their programs where as the other networks rarely do unless its some squishy wimp like John Kasich or others who they know won't push conservative ideology too far.

Apparently you do not watch ARI on MSNBC at 4pm mst.....as a lawyer, he attempts to fill
in the left and right spaces for a balanced pov.

Rush Limbaugh doesn't work for Fox.

What is ARI? I can think of only one guy on TV or in print who actually does what a journalist should do, Chris Wallace. Tim Russert was another one but he's dead, like most of journalism.

Rick wrote: What is ARI? I can think of only one guy on TV or in print who actually does what a journalist should do, Chris Wallace. Tim Russert was another one but he's dead, like most of journalism.

www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-n...n-over-trump-915782/


I am SO-O-O elated that you find the FACTS correct per Chris Wallace.....the collective is
having a come to Jesus moement?