When the villain is Obama, not Trump, news suddenly becomes not worth reporting

Re: the first post, I didn't jump on that article because the numbers were suspiciously high following reporting earlier this year. Good thing they caught it (sloppy of the author to not double-check before submitting for publication), admitted their error, and removed the incorrect info. Why leave false info up to be shared?

So if Reuters reported on the situation in 2015 does that mean we can acknowledge there's no reason to be outraged?

Waves of immigrant minors present crisis for Obama, Congress
Richard Cowan, Reuters | MAY 28, 2014

U.S. report calls for release of immigrant children from detention
Reporting by Richard Cowan; Editing by Lisa Shumaker and Leslie Adler, Reuters | SEPTEMBER 17, 2015

US: Release Detained Migrant Children, Mothers
Federal Court Rejects Administration’s Family Detention Policy[/u][/color][/size]
Human Rights Watch, July 27, 2015

Re: the 2nd post. Horowitz's report found no evidence of political bias in the opening of investigations into people on the Trump campaign, so on what grounds should those agents be fired? Does this mean that pro-Trump agents should also be fired?
‘Shit just got real’: Texts in FISA report show FBI agents with pro-Trump bias
by Caitlin Yilek, Washington Examiner | December 09, 2019

The DOJ inspector general's Russia report did find FBI bias against Hillary Clinton, again
Peter Weber, The Week | December 10, 2019

In Horowitz's previous report on the FBI and the 2016 election, he detailed how FBI and Justice Department leaders were so concerned about anti-Clinton leaks from the FBI's New York field office — former Attorney General Loretta Lynch told Horowitz it was "clear to me that there is a cadre of senior people in New York who have a deep and visceral hatred of Secretary Clinton" — they decided they had to publicly disclose that the FBI was briefly reopening the Clinton email investigation in late October 2016.

Me, I think they should only be fired if they exhibited actions which were partisan in nature and did not follow established protocol. If they simply spouted personal feelings in text messages, but still did their jobs ethically, then I don't care.