OMNIPOTENT at it's finest

www.businessinsider.com/trump-weighs-bar...-leader-calls-2020-2

OMNIPOTENT.....the king considers NO ONE should be dialed into foreign leader calls...(of course, ONLY those select stooges that bow
to his every whim are invited).....the unleashing of the egocentric idiot is breath taking in it's completeness. WATCH WHAT HAPPENS

homeagain wrote: www.businessinsider.com/trump-weighs-bar...-leader-calls-2020-2

OMNIPOTENT.....the king considers NO ONE should be dialed into foreign leader calls...(of course, ONLY those select stooges that bow
to his every whim are invited).....the unleashing of the egocentric idiot is breath taking in it's completeness. WATCH WHAT HAPPENS

[/b]


www.cnn.com/2020/02/18/politics/federal-...ger-stone/index.html

2,000 is a TON of concerned officials......a meeting is being called to address the audacity of
the king....you are watching democracy disintegrate before your very eyes.

Maybe he is worried about leaks from Democrats who want to sabotage any current negotiations? It has happened before.

homeagain wrote:

homeagain wrote: www.businessinsider.com/trump-weighs-bar...-leader-calls-2020-2

OMNIPOTENT.....the king considers NO ONE should be dialed into foreign leader calls...(of course, ONLY those select stooges that bow
to his every whim are invited).....the unleashing of the egocentric idiot is breath taking in it's completeness. WATCH WHAT HAPPENS

[/b]


www.cnn.com/2020/02/18/politics/federal-...ger-stone/index.html

2,000 is a TON of concerned officials......a meeting is being called to address the audacity of
the king....you are watching democracy disintegrate before your very eyes.

I think you are looking in the wrong place to see democracy disintegrate.

homeagain wrote:

homeagain wrote: www.businessinsider.com/trump-weighs-bar...-leader-calls-2020-2

OMNIPOTENT.....the king considers NO ONE should be dialed into foreign leader calls...(of course, ONLY those select stooges that bow
to his every whim are invited).....the unleashing of the egocentric idiot is breath taking in it's completeness. WATCH WHAT HAPPENS

[/b]


www.cnn.com/2020/02/18/politics/federal-...ger-stone/index.html

2,000 is a TON of concerned officials......a meeting is being called to address the audacity of
the king....you are watching democracy disintegrate before your very eyes.

2000 isn't a very big number when it comes to Trump hating lawyers and judges, especially if paid by taxpayers.

SC, you (collectively) have set the bar too high. Muller was going to prove he was in Putin's pocket. There have been countless other hair on fires since then.

It is like the boy who cried wolf. The more times you call wolf the more people want to kick the Shepard boy.

ScienceChic wrote: Do you have proof that each and every one of those lawyers and judges are "Trump haters?"

From homeagain's link:

The actions prompted more than 2,000 former Justice Department officials who served in Republican as well as Democratic administrations to sign a statement calling on Barr to resign.

At what point does Trump's behavior cross the line? Only when it impacts you (meant in the general sense, not replying to anyone here in particular) personally? He has now attacked a federal judge and a juror. The judge is a member of another branch of government that is meant to be a check and balance to his, does not serve under him, and she is doing her job. The juror is an ordinary citizen who was screened and chosen for that jury duty by both the prosecution and defense - any one of us could be a juror. How would you feel if the President of the United States attacked you personally for a decision you made while doing your civic duty?

How would you feel if you were a defendant and found out the jury foreman had an extreme bias against you that wasn't disclosed?

As for my statement about Trump haters, I'm using my common sense. Do you know of anybody that is indifferent when it comes to liking Trump or is it your experience that people either love him or hate him? The Russia joke was investigated by all Trump haters and not one who was a supporter or even someone who would question all the shady and illegal methods used to take him down.

And one more thing, when you say Trump "attacks" someone, you're basically saying he doesn't have a right to criticize anyone he disagree's with. Being a judge or a juror does not give you some kind of immunity from scrutiny. Like it or not, even the president has the right to free speech. I can think of many instances when Obama criticized police officers before he had any facts and I don't remember you saying anything about that.

Do you have proof that each and every one of those lawyers and judges are "Trump haters?"

"Campaign Donations Show Letter Demanding Barr’s Resignation Comes From Leftist Hacks Pretending To Be ‘Bipartisan’
Had liberal outlets bothered to act like journalists, they would have quickly discovered evidence of a partisan bias underlying the letter calling for William Barr’s resignation.
Margot ClevelandBy Margot Cleveland
FEBRUARY 19, 2020
“More than 1,100 former federal prosecutors and Justice Department officials called on Attorney General William P. Barr on Sunday to step down after he intervened last week to lower the Justice Department’s sentencing recommendation for President Trump’s longtime friend Roger J. Stone, Jr.,” The New York Times reported on Sunday—if you can call it reporting.

Not once in the 800-word article did the Times address the overwhelming evidence that the thousand-plus signatories were politically motivated critics of President Donald Trump. In fact, to the contrary, the Times claimed “the former Justice Department lawyers” “came from across the political spectrum” to sign the open letter that condemned “President Trump’s and Attorney General Barr’s interference in the fair administration of justice.” Those actions, the much-touted letter claimed, “require Mr. Barr to resign.”

thefederalist.com/2020/02/19/campaign-do....Xk1aM5k7B1M.twitter