the CHINA CONNECTION....consider this

25 Oct 2020 08:16 #1 by homeagain
www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2020/1...-lease/#68d84bbded11

Just as there are questionable actions with Biden/Hunter....EQUALLY the elusive status of the king/Ivanka dealings with China are to be researched and
questioned.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Oct 2020 08:19 #2 by Pony Soldier
How ridiculous! A lease from 2008, long before Trump was even thinking politics?? Biden is COMPROMISED!!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Oct 2020 08:28 #3 by Rick
If this were some kind of proof that there is criminal or corrupt activity, the media and the FI would have already told us about it. It would be much easier than making up a huge Russia collusion plot. Dream on

It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy

George Orwell

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Oct 2020 08:32 #4 by homeagain

Pony Soldier wrote: How ridiculous! A lease from 2008, long before Trump was even thinking politics?? Biden is COMPROMISED!!!


Trump moved from the skyscraper to the White House in 2017, but he held onto ownership of the retail and office space in the building, through his 100% interest in an entity called Trump Tower Commercial LLC. That put him in an unusual position, given that government-owned entities in China hold at least 70% of the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. Suddenly, a routine real estate deal became a conduit for a foreign superpower to pay the president of the United States.

perhaps REREADING the article might clarify some issues....emolument clause of the US CONSTITUTION
appears to come int play.....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Oct 2020 08:38 #5 by Rick

homeagain wrote:

Pony Soldier wrote: How ridiculous! A lease from 2008, long before Trump was even thinking politics?? Biden is COMPROMISED!!!


Trump moved from the skyscraper to the White House in 2017, but he held onto ownership of the retail and office space in the building, through his 100% interest in an entity called Trump Tower Commercial LLC. That put him in an unusual position, given that government-owned entities in China hold at least 70% of the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. Suddenly, a routine real estate deal became a conduit for a foreign superpower to pay the president of the United States.

perhaps REREADING the article might clarify some issues....emolument clause of the US CONSTITUTION
appears to come int play.....

Since the Democrats are so smart, why hasn't Trump been charged with any crime? Again, if this was an issue he would have been impeached over it.

It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy

George Orwell

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Oct 2020 09:01 #6 by homeagain
ince the Democrats are so smart, why hasn't Trump been charged with any crime? Again, if this was an issue he would have been impeached over it. RICK writes......I reply

OH MY, I shall repeat....this is a mystery novel,the plot is pushing forward....we do NOT have all the chapters
read.....remember "Murder on the Orient Express"....THE TWIST of fate was a surprise (at least for me).
There were so MANY alternative narratives....but, in the end, JUSTICE was served.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Oct 2020 09:45 #7 by Pony Soldier
Oh my!! This is rich!:

The Trump Organization reportedly donated a total of $343,000 to the U.S. Treasury in 2017 and 2018, Trump’s first two years as president. Yet, a document connected to Trump Tower suggests that over those same two years, the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China was set to pay about $3.9 million in rent. Operating profit margins inside the building are an estimated 42%, which would suggest that the deal yielded $1.6 million of earnings over those two years. Even if you only count roughly 70% of that money as coming from the Chinese government, it still adds up to $1.2 million—or more than three times what the Trump Organization reportedly gave to the Treasury.

sooo, the Trump Organization has donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to the treasury but the article is complaining that is isn't enough. This from the same rag that claims he only paid $750 in taxes??? C'mon man!


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.141 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+