FredHayek wrote: It is tradition to celebrate an appointment to the White House. Obama celebrated Elena Kagan's appointment.
Oh, but Fred, this was so much different that when Obama celebrated with his appointees. This was theatrics on a grand scale, worthy of McDonald's reality star status.
Do you have anything to say on the idiotic Kavanaugh comments?
[/b]
U have to consider the COMPLETE character of K. and when U do,the comment is NO surprise.
I am ATTEMPTING to give this new judge a neutral position...altho,FIRST out of the gate was a request
for her to recuse her self from the election decision.....THAT and her view on R V W decided correctly.
We already known K.'s opinion and with the new appointee being HIGHLY religious oriented, it will
be interesting IF she considers the law CORRECTLY decided....I have other concerns,but will WAIT
AND WATCH....if she can be impartial and fair as she has stated in her interviews....
ramage wrote: "What respect is left in a court that has been packed with underqualified judges appointed by McDonald? "
Please elucidate the reasons for stating that Justice Amy Coney Barrett is underqualified?
Served only three years on Seventh Circuit as a judge.
Compare to Merrick Garland, who has served on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia since 1997, which is 20 more years of judicial experience than Barrett.
ramage wrote: Let's make this simple, Kooobookie, what are the necessary qualifications for a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, in your opinion.
You already had checkmate when you asked her about Kagan's experience.
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy