Swamp Thing

Pony Soldier wrote: I’m starting a thread to list all of the disgusting sell-outs that Biden is trying to appoint. We’ll just start with his pick for SoS.

thefederalist.com/2020/12/02/consulting-...-to-communist-china/

OOPS.....I guess the "scrubbing"team was sleeping on the job.

THE WHOLE of this "he did it",but MY guy is clean is clearly a I "gotcha game"...let it die and dig the grave.
It is MORE than tiresome to continue the contest of "who is more corrupt".....THEY ARE ALL COMPLICIT.

As of this moment IVANKA is being grilled over questionable action....give it up...U R not going to convince anyone....

Yes, that sounds much better than “Organized the theft of intellectual property...”.

Baaa. Baaa.

Pony Soldier wrote: Yes, that sounds much better than “Organized the theft of intellectual property...”.

More baseless B.S....

" list all of the disgusting sell-outs that Biden is trying to appoint. We’ll just start with his pick for SoS."

IT IS about BIDEN.....the stealing of intellectual proper is secondary....PS is pissed because all of
TRUMP'S troubles are piling up and the king can't control/manipulate the outcome.

Actually, I'm moving on because there isn't time enough before the electors meet to even gather evidence to show election fraud. Forensic audits were needed starting day 1 but they were blocked by judges and now we have at least half the country thinking that we don't have free and fair elections any more.

I've now moved into resist mode. NOT MY PRESIDENT will be my mantra starting 1/20/21. It is impressive - the absolute loyalty that the intel agencies have engendered in so much of the US population. All they had to do was control the media (which they have done for may years) and then say nothing else is a credible source. Everyone just falls in line then. Twitter, Facebook, Google and Wikipedia simply censor what they're told and say anything else isn't credible. If I hear that word one more time, I think I'll vomit..

Pony Soldier, has it ever entered your mind, for even a tiny fraction of a second, that perhaps you might be wrong? That all the main stream media outlets, the judges, the Secretaries of State, might be correct in their decisions? That the election was actually fair and free and without fraud?

Four weeks. It's been a full month since the election. That's how long Trump and his team have had to put together cases and gather evidence. Perhaps there is no there there.

Pony Soldier wrote: Actually, I'm moving on because there isn't time enough before the electors meet to even gather evidence to show election fraud.

This was the Swamp Thing thread, remember?

koobookie wrote: Pony Soldier, has it ever entered your mind, for even a tiny fraction of a second, that perhaps you might be wrong? That all the main stream media outlets, the judges, the Secretaries of State, might be correct in their decisions? That the election was actually fair and free and without fraud?

Four weeks. It's been a full month since the election. That's how long Trump and his team have had to put together cases and gather evidence. Perhaps there is no there there.

I have actually considered that because so many have done such an exceptional job of gaslighting but then I see videos of suitcases of ballots being pulled out from under a table after the poll watchers were sent home in Georgia and I know that I'm not the crazy one. The statistical evidence alone should cause a revote.

Pony Soldier wrote: I have actually considered that because so many have done such an exceptional job of gaslighting but then I see videos of suitcases of ballots being pulled out from under a table after the poll watchers were sent home in Georgia and I know that I'm not the crazy one. The statistical evidence alone should cause a revote.

If that actually happened, why hasn't it been introduced in court?