OH,but I do understand...I have been an "outlander" all my life...I call it out.when I see (to my detriment
most times).....INTEGRITY is non negotiable with me. IF a company/person is complicit in wrong doing and
I KNOW ABOUT IT,then I "cancel"my dealings with that person/entity.
BREEN BROWN talks about "courage " in a TED TALK...she states right up front,IF U OPT FOR COURAGE, U should expect to receive boatloads of shit.
I have gone to the mat MANY TIMES with corp America (there was a union)...I WON EVERY TIME, which of, course,pissed them off. So,getting use to being "targeted" is a given. I am VERY selective of who let into my life...business or personal.
I disagree Rick. I think it has everything to do with it because that’s when this coup started. I’ll just give you the answer to my previous query to build that case a bit...
William Barr was the key architect of the surveillance state after 9/11. He was responsible for planning and implementation of surveillance that makes China blush. He employed Robert Mueller to keep the secret.
Fast forward to today and you’ll see the emergence of apps such as Twitter, Facebook etc. that literally keep a digital eye on large swaths of the population. Couple that with cell phone records and location services and, as we know, there is no privacy. Now the mechanism is in place for the great reset.
The switch gets flipped through a questionable election. (I’m trying to be charity here with the watered down term “questionable”. What are they now most afraid of? That the people will rise up and take power back from them. They stop that from happening by shaming anyone who dares to question. If they persist, they get deplatformed, lose their job, bank accounts canceling, insurance cancelled....you get the picture. They lock down the Capitol so that no protests can occur. (I won’t even go into why that screams false flag).
The next step is to destroy sovereignty and currency. Never doubt me...
Pony Soldier wrote: I disagree Rick. I think it has everything to do with it because that’s when this coup started. I’ll just give you the answer to my previous query to build that case a bit...
William Barr was the key architect of the surveillance state after 9/11. He was responsible for planning and implementation of surveillance that makes China blush. He employed Robert Mueller to keep the secret.
Fast forward to today and you’ll see the emergence of apps such as Twitter, Facebook etc. that literally keep a digital eye on large swaths of the population. Couple that with cell phone records and location services and, as we know, there is no privacy. Now the mechanism is in place for the great reset.
The switch gets flipped through a questionable election. (I’m trying to be charity here with the watered down term “questionable”. What are they now most afraid of? That the people will rise up and take power back from them. They stop that from happening by shaming anyone who dares to question. If they persist, they get deplatformed, lose their job, bank accounts canceling, insurance cancelled....you get the picture. They lock down the Capitol so that no protests can occur. (I won’t even go into why that screams false flag).
The next step is to destroy sovereignty and currency. Never doubt me...
Ok, I see what angle you're taking here, thanks for a more clear and coherent explanation. I'm talking about the intent of the cancelling and you're taking about the means in which the cancelling can be implemented. I agree fully, that's why this is much more dangerous than it would be 50 years ago when we didn't have the technology to make this spread like wildfire. Bottom line is that the technology wouldn't be the problem if there wasn't the fascist intent from so many people and businesses that don't value freedom of speech and thought.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
Yeah, it’s a one world government, new world order thing I believe. The people pushing it actually believe that this is the only way we don’t end in global nuclear war. Maybe they have a point but I still prefer freedom.
AND now u KNOW why I do not have a cell phone,off soc. media (except here).....my life is simple.because
I consciously made choices that allow for SOME freedom.....again, I am NOT a sheeple.
Pony Soldier wrote: We agree on that. Guess, if you’ll indulge me a bit, who was responsible for putting the surveillance state into place in all of its illegal glory...
Lest we forget, H.W. Bush was the head of the CIA before his Vice-Presidency under Reagan. Prior to that CIA job he was the chief liaison officer to the PRC (China).
He was the epitome of the Swamp, Deep State.
He never had Reagan's confidence, evinced by the fact that Reagan, in 8 yrs, never had Bush for dinner in the White House.
Bush bided his time, got the Presidency in 1988 and started to dismantle Reagan's policies. Remember "Read my lips, No new taxes".
Unfortunately for Bush, Clinton became President in 1992 ( thank God for Ross Perot). When Clinton tried to dismantle Reagan more quickly than Bush, the 1994 midterms put a stop to that. Had Bush been re-elected in 1992, I think that he would have been worse than Clinton.