The 2016 review noted that “based on the survey results, Judge Chase received ratings below the average of all district court judges standing for retention including case management, application and knowledge of the law, communications and demeanor.” It added, “though Judge Chase’s scores were concerning, the Commission is cognizant of the steep learning curve for a new district court judge.”
Chase maintained that she did “not intend any racial animus,” but did acknowledge that her statements violated a rule “which requires a judge to act in a manner that promotes public confidence in the judiciary” The court asked Chase to step down, which she has accepted.
IT (HER COMMENT) provides a level of UNAWARENESS, that a person of her age SHOULD have been
more perceptive....SPECIFICALLY because of her chosen career path. I have reservations on her
ability to RULE EFFECTIVELY.