30 percent preceive VIOLENCE as vital

28 May 2021 08:11 #11 by homeagain
I ask that U REREAD the link a provided in my previous post in this thread,it is LONG,but thought provoking
and germane to your present questions.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 May 2021 08:34 #12 by Rick

homeagain wrote: I ask that U REREAD the link a provided in my previous post in this thread,it is LONG,but thought provoking
and germane to your present questions.

I've said it before and I will continue to say it... I'm not interested in reading someone else's thoughts, I'm interested in YOURS. If you post a link to a long article, I think it would be pretty easy for you to give your synopsis in a clear and coherent statement. Once I read your opinion, then I will be interested in reading said article so I can compare that content with your summary. That is the best and only way to really understand your point. Does that make any sense to you?

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 May 2021 14:04 #13 by homeagain
I have given U my POV...and then backed it up with RESEARCH, u elect to disregard the research....
time and time again. The Fourth Turning is a concept that is PLAYING OUT in the headlines. It is part
of a cycle,from a historical reference. It is the same with racism, we have NOT progressed one step..
Rodney King was how long ago? THEN, we have witnessed a F.U. from the black community,when the
verdict came back for O. J. Simpson...NOT GUILTY. (which was a farce,in many peoples eyes). Turning
a blind eye and refusing to see the obvious,is a huge mistake,one that will severely impact our nation's
ability to move forward in a constructive manner.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

01 Jun 2021 08:31 #14 by FredHayek

Rick wrote:

homeagain wrote: I ask that U REREAD the link a provided in my previous post in this thread,it is LONG,but thought provoking
and germane to your present questions.

I've said it before and I will continue to say it... I'm not interested in reading someone else's thoughts, I'm interested in YOURS. If you post a link to a long article, I think it would be pretty easy for you to give your synopsis in a clear and coherent statement. Once I read your opinion, then I will be interested in reading said article so I can compare that content with your summary. That is the best and only way to really understand your point. Does that make any sense to you?

Agree. This is a local message board. I read it to get the opinions of locals, not to get newspaper clippings sent to me in envelopes with no comments.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

01 Jun 2021 09:55 #15 by homeagain
SORRY, U can't have it both ways.....typing tripe and NOT providing a basis for your belief....FAKE NEWS
is so frivolous and fraudulent. RETWEETING and not checking validity. is rampant. POV is just
that,until proof is VERIFIED and then provided.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

01 Jun 2021 15:42 #16 by FredHayek

homeagain wrote: SORRY, U can't have it both ways.....typing tripe and NOT providing a basis for your belief....FAKE NEWS
is so frivolous and fraudulent. RETWEETING and not checking validity. is rampant. POV is just
that,until proof is VERIFIED and then provided.

Even when half your sources are behind pay walls, are ad heavy, and most often opinion pieces masquerading as news stories?

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

01 Jun 2021 16:08 #17 by homeagain
Your choice how U want to obtain your news......I attempt credible sources...FORBES,REUTERS,THEHILL
NPR,MARKETWATCH....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.132 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+