Two Frauds, Two Books

If it wasn't bad enough that Andrew Cuomo decided to write a book about his spectacular leadership during a pandemic, now we are blessed with one from Anthony Fauci. Both men made major mistakes and were anything but heroic, but that's no reason not to capitalize on a global tragedy and line your pockets. My question is, who in the hell would pay to read one of these books when both men either lied or were proven to be anything but accurate in dealing with the pandemic?

If anyone here is planning on reading one of these books, I'd just be interested to know why.

I'll read them, perhaps when they are available at the public library.

Writing a book is a quickway to transfer money to one's favored political players. To wit,

"Joe and Jill Biden reported earning $16.5 million from book deals and speaking engagements since leaving the White House"
Their main sources of income were from book deals they signed after leaving the White House and dozens of speaking engagements, with Joe Biden regularly charging six figures for a single speech.

www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/joe-and-...te-house/ar-BB19xLnV

To Rick.....LAURIE GARRETT is the only author I would buy,her understanding of the dynamics of this dire
situation is dead on.

Agree, these book deals they give politicians are in exchange for political favors. The sales data never adds up.

homeagain wrote: To Rick.....LAURIE GARRETT is the only author I would buy,her understanding of the dynamics of this dire
situation is dead on.

I really don't care who reads Fauci's book, my point is that this fraud got nothing right, just like Cuomo and he has been hailed as a hero by the leftist media, just like Cuomo was.

The fact that there was no investigative journalism when it came to the origin of this virus and all of Fauci's guesses should tell you everything you need to know about the state of our media 'watchdogs'. Just read Fauci's emails that just came out... his bullshit will be clearly visible.

Laurie Garrett got it RIGHT.....if U do the research, there r those who sounded the alarm,but got no press.

homeagain wrote: Laurie Garrett got it RIGHT.....if U do the research, there r those who sounded the alarm,but got no press.

So why didn't she get any press if she was right? That is the point I'm trying to make here... the media failed once again and that failure should result in consequences.

As long as Fauci disagreed with the Trump administration, that's really all the press needed to report on, everything else they could label 'disinformation'. Big tech Twitter, Facebook, and Youtube were happy to oblige by censoring anyone who would disagree with the universal leftist narrative. That is a fact and it can be verified with evidence.

Wow. Amazon and other internet websites are no longer taking pre-orders for Fauci's new book. This happened after his damaging e-mail's were released due to a FOIA request. Why isn't the White House covering for the man any longer? FOIA's can be held up for years, especially if you want to protect someone working for you.

Maybe Fauci's mishandling of the AID's crisis is giving him back some bad karma?

FredHayek wrote: Wow. Amazon and other internet websites are no longer taking pre-orders for Fauci's new book. This happened after his damaging e-mail's were released due to a FOIA request. Why isn't the White House covering for the man any longer? FOIA's can be held up for years, especially if you want to protect someone working for you.

Maybe Fauci's mishandling of the AID's crisis is giving him back some bad karma?

The worthless press will do with fauci what they've done with all their other false heroes (Avanati, Cuomo, Smollete, etc.), they will leave them in the dustbin of history and pretend like they never praised them as heroes.

This would be an excellent time to start a new journalism restart, where journalists actually look for truth, even if it goes against their personal ideologies. Fat chance.