46 out of 47 nations in Europe require photo ID's to vote. Mexico requires it. Poor India, the world's largest democracy still decided it was worth it to issue all their voters a photo ID to vote.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
All true Fred, yet our worthless politicians on the left and their media suckups want the sheep to believe that requiring an ID is racist. What is racist is saying that black people are somehow less able to get a free ID, even though they have 2-4 years to get one and they are free.
Cue the crickets...
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
Rick wrote: All true Fred, yet our worthless politicians on the left and their media suckups want the sheep to believe that requiring an ID is racist. What is racist is saying that black people are somehow less able to get a free ID, even though they have 2-4 years to get one and they are free.
Cue the crickets...
Yes. And why does a photo ID requirement hurt Democrat voters more than Republican? Lately there has been a surge of social conservative Hispanics voting for Republicans in the border states. Wouldn't it be amusing if large parts of California and New Mexico become Republican again because of Democrats in those states refusing to require photo ID's?
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
FredHayek wrote:
Yes. And why does a photo ID requirement hurt Democrat voters more than Republican?
It doesn't, at least not for people who are LEGALLY able to vote.
I'd still like to hear from people who think voter ID is somehow racist when almost every other country in the world requires an ID to vote. I'd like to hear that logic, if it exists.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
