White House Colludes with Big Tech Monopoly to Censor Speech

Rick wrote:

homeagain wrote:
OH PLEASE, every other word out of Trumps' mouth was FAKE NEWS.....a form of negative narrative
that in essence,put in question/prohibited REAL FACTS....the idea is the same, just fashioned in a
different form.

Every word huh? Now if I said that about Biden (who lies on a regular basis), you'd demand sources to back that up.

How about you just address the topic for once, which is government pushing a massive private monopoly to censor speech since the government can't do it. I just want to know if you think that is a good precedent to set in a country where we are supposed to have freedom of speech. I've never read anywhere that freedom of speedh only pertains to speech that the government deems to be accurate.

Rick, I believe HA did answer when she said this: "Second, the answer is YES,when u try to subvert the truth, it is a matter of semantics .....FAKE NEWS,
forbidden facts....ALL THE SAME"

As with everything it is open to interpretation my take is that it means that HA is ok with censorship.
My take is that makes it a sad day for
America.

I will ask the question AGAIN, so,apparently u think it is OK (free speech intact) to encourage someone to
commit suicide on soc. media?? U also think threatening someone with physical harm is OK(I want
to slash your throat) ...the former DID occur and she was charged and found guilty....U CAN NOT SPEAK
SHIT on soc.media and not expect repercussions. Some form/perimeter of control IS mandatory. I think IF
people (en mass) would stand up and state NOT IN MY PRESENCE....the world would not be so screwed
(it is called courage and integrity)

homeagain wrote: I will ask the question AGAIN, so,apparently u think it is OK (free speech intact) to encourage someone to
commit suicide on soc. media?? U also think threatening someone with physical harm is OK(I want
to slash your throat) ...the former DID occur and she was charged and found guilty....U CAN NOT SPEAK
SHIT on soc.media and not expect repercussions. Some form/perimeter of control IS mandatory. I think IF
people (en mass) would stand up and state NOT IN MY PRESENCE....the world would not be so screwed
(it is called courage and integrity)

You keep defelcting to extremes that don't answer the question at hand. With a simple yes or no, is it ok for the government to pressure a private company to censor speech that the government deems disinformation? For you to answer yes, that would mean that you trust the government to be 100% accurate 100% of the time. Information always changes but our freedom of speech should not be changed for any government.

Rick wrote:

homeagain wrote: I will ask the question AGAIN, so,apparently u think it is OK (free speech intact) to encourage someone to
commit suicide on soc. media?? U also think threatening someone with physical harm is OK(I want
to slash your throat) ...the former DID occur and she was charged and found guilty....U CAN NOT SPEAK
SHIT on soc.media and not expect repercussions. Some form/perimeter of control IS mandatory. I think IF
people (en mass) would stand up and state NOT IN MY PRESENCE....the world would not be so screwed
(it is called courage and integrity)

You keep defelcting to extremes that don't answer the question at hand. With a simple yes or no, is it ok for the government to pressure a private company to censor speech that the government deems disinformation? For you to answer yes, that would mean that you trust the government to be 100% accurate 100% of the time. Information always changes but our freedom of speech should not be changed for any government.

It is NOT a deflection, it is an example of today's extreme behavior AND CONSEQUENCES.....OH BY THE WAY, there is this

ttps://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2017/03/6-exceptions-to-freedom-of-speech/?utm_source=Google Grant - Freedom of Speech&utm_campaign=Google Grant - Freedom of.

there are exceptions...DO THE RESEARCH.

It's not a simple "yes" or "no" answer because we're in the middle a worldwide pandemic. But, should our government, in an effort to battle false misinformation about COVID-19 ask social media to remove public posts that seem to all be coming from 12 individuals? Yes. We're at war with a worldwide pandemic and we've already lost more Americans than many of our previous wars combined. I'm sure deliberate misinformation had some role in that. But, I would go further. Bring those 12 individuals to court and let them present their so-called "evidence." If it is medically proven to be wrong, throw them in prison.

homeagain wrote:

Rick wrote:

homeagain wrote: I will ask the question AGAIN, so,apparently u think it is OK (free speech intact) to encourage someone to
commit suicide on soc. media?? U also think threatening someone with physical harm is OK(I want
to slash your throat) ...the former DID occur and she was charged and found guilty....U CAN NOT SPEAK
SHIT on soc.media and not expect repercussions. Some form/perimeter of control IS mandatory. I think IF
people (en mass) would stand up and state NOT IN MY PRESENCE....the world would not be so screwed
(it is called courage and integrity)

You keep defelcting to extremes that don't answer the question at hand. With a simple yes or no, is it ok for the government to pressure a private company to censor speech that the government deems disinformation? For you to answer yes, that would mean that you trust the government to be 100% accurate 100% of the time. Information always changes but our freedom of speech should not be changed for any government.

It is NOT a deflection, it is an example of today's extreme behavior AND CONSEQUENCES.....OH BY THE WAY, there is this

ttps://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2017/03/6-exceptions-to-freedom-of-speech/?utm_source=Google Grant - Freedom of Speech&utm_campaign=Google Grant - Freedom of.

there are exceptions...DO THE RESEARCH.

Can I finally get you to admit that you are ok with the government censoring speech via a private company?

Can I FINALLY get u to do the research.....Wayne was correct,but u (collectively) think otherwise...it is
a choice,THAT is your right. The thought police r not present here.

homeagain wrote: Can I FINALLY get u to do the research.....Wayne was correct,but u (collectively) think otherwise...it is
a choice,THAT is your right. The thought police r not present here.

I've done the research and it doesn't change the fact that I don't think it's ok for the government to censor speech via a private monopoly and aparrently you think it's ok. If you don't think this censorship will happen in other areas once it's been normailzed, I think you should fooling yourself.

I'm sorry, let me explain. WE LOST ALL that was important in America,when after Sept 11th,we gladly gave the government the right to do most anything,in exchange for perceived SECURITY.JMO

President Bush should have called "The Patriot Act" "The Eavesdropping Act" and then maybe you'd be more upset about it all, Rick.